User Alert: We must temporarily divide the Protoball Chronology into two sections.  Entries up to 1850 are on this page.  A file for entries from 1840 to 1862 is here.

 

Back to the Protoball Home Page

 

Skip Right to the Pre-1850 Chronology

 

Skip right to the 1840-1862 Chronology

 

 

Subtopic Files: This page shows the full Protoball 1150-item working chronology.  There are selective chronologies available on African-American play [9 items], “Bat-Ball” and “Bat-and-Ball” References [New: 20 items],  Local Bans of ballplaying [52 items],  Central/Western New York State  Ballplaying [38 items], Ballplaying in California [New: 12 entries], Ballplaying in Canada [New: 22 items], Ballplaying on Campus [75 items], Cricket in North America [New: 126 entries], Famous People with Links to Ballplaying [69 items], Female play [31 items], The Hazard of Ballplaying [New: 9 entries], Holiday Ballplaying [33 items], Ballplaying in the U.S. Military [New: 25 items], Ballplaying as Reflected in Narrative Fiction [20 items], Ballplaying in the New England States [130 items], Ballplaying in New Jersey [New: 12 items], NYC Ballplaying Before the Knickerbockers [58 items], A Few Oddball Games [6 items], Ballplaying Outside English-Speaking Areas 17 items], Ballplaying in Philadelphia [New: 36 items], English Rounders [42 items], Ballplaying in the American South [New:14 items], Ballplaying in St. Louis and Southern Illinois [New: 21 items], Stoolball [58 items], Town Ball [46 items], the game of Wicket [57 items], and Ballplaying in Wisconsin [New: 6 items].

 

New Entries Only:  To browse the 190 newest [April 2010] entries, go here.

 

Re-ordered Version 10: For a version of the 2008 Chronology that lists entries in chronological order within the calendar years 1844-1861, go here.

 

 

 

 

 

Version 11, updated April 2010

 

 

The Protoball Working Chronology of Early Ball Play --

2500BC through 1862AD

 

 

Project History:  This chronology originated with an initial listing by John Thorn and Tom Heitz, one that included about 70 entries.  We took that popular set and had added another 200 entries by 2004, always adding formal citations where we could, so that investigators could recheck original data as needed.  About 50 ofthese items came from previously uncollected references in a prize-winning paper by

Tom Altherr.  In 2005, David Block’s landmark Baseball Before We Knew It was published, furnishing over 150 new entries for subsequent versions of the Protoball chronology.  Researchers, many of them subscribers to the SABR “19CBB” listserve, have since added hundreds more.  Version 11 adds about 190 new items, raising the total to about 1150 entries.  Over 50 of these new entries are taken from Bill Ryczek’s new book, Baseball’s First Inning.

 

Scope:  The Protoball list includes entries for what we here term “safe haven” ball games (i.e., ball games that use bases), including base ball, town ball, cricket, wicket, and the old-cat games, but exclusing the many other stick-and-ball games such as golf, the several racket sports, croquet, field hockey, and hurling.  The earliest entries range worldwide, the middle years focus mainly on games in the English-speaking nations, and the latter portion focuses mainly on games played in North America. The objective is to trace baseball’s early roots, as well as the roots of most the game’s essential rules.

 

It’s a Work in Progress:  This chronology is a work in progress. Your contributions are welcome in completing and emending it.  Our hope is to ultimately create a searchable file of useful primary information on the evolution of safe-haven ballgames.  For more information, to make suggestions, or to add to the chronology, contact Larry McCray at Lmccray@mit.edu. 

 

Key: Serial numbers for the entries comprise the year of the reported event [for example, “1820s” means “in the 1820’s,” and “1823c” means “circa 1823”] and an identifying numerical suffix.  The reader should note the unavoidable imprecision in assigning some dates; for example, if a memoirist who was born in 1813 reports that he played ball as a youth, the date is probably recorded as “1823c,” but could obviously be a few years off either way.  The reader should habitually take caution in the long-time memories of the dates, if not the facts, of reflective accounts; after all, neurologists now tell us that the human memory is not an indelible digital storage device. Entries for any one year are not listed in chronological sequence.

 

Please Contribute Comments, Data, and Corrections:  Reader comments are especially welcome to fill information needs for open queries that follow the term “Note:” within an entry.

 

Important Caveat on the Authenticity of Entries:  The Protoball Project includes published claims for historical events associated with the evolution of baseball.  Some of these claims have been questioned – and some ridiculed -- within today’s research community.  Instead of withholding such claims [which lay forever unchallenged in published sources] , we include most of them, noting any current doubts as to their reliability in “Caution” and “Caveat” notations.  The reader should not take the appearance of an item in the Chronology to imply our endorsement of the authenticity of that item.  We welcome communications from you about listed claims that you find questionable in light of historical evidence.

 

Access to Protoball File Information: If you are writing about early ballplaying, for publication or for a term paper, say, we will be pleased to supply facsimiles of material from our paper files on our entries.  For large requests, we ask that you cover our out-of-pocket expenses for photocopying and mailing.  Upon request, we are also pleased to consult the contents of the Buzz McCray Collection of books, which amount to about 15 shelf-feet of books and papers, all of which are listed on Protoball’s Buzz McCray Bibliography on Early Ballplaying.

 

How the Chronology Grew From 70 Entries to its Current Size

 

 

-----------------------------------------

 

 

The Protoball Chronology – Version 11

 

BC2500C.1 – “Tip cats” Found in Egyptian Ruins

 

Writing in 1891, Stewart Culin reported “the discovery by Mr. Flinders-Petrie of wooden ‘tip cats’ among the remains of Rahun, in the Fayoom, Egypt (circa 2500 B.C).”  Culin infers that these short wooden objects, pointed on each end, were used in an ancient form of the game Cat.

 

Culin, Stewart, “Street Games of Boys in Brooklyn, N.Y.,” Journal of American Folklore, Volume 4, number 14 (July-September 1891), page 233, note 1.  Query:  Do contemporary archeologists agree that such items were evidence of play?  Have they since found older artifacts that may be associated with cat-like games?   

 

BC2400C.1 – Egyptian Text Has “Strike the Ball” Reference

 

“The earliest known references to seker-hemat (translation: batting the ball) as a fertility rite and ritual of renewal are inscribed in pyramids dating to 2400 BC.”  An Egyptologist reads Pyramid Texts Spell 254 as commanding a pharaoh to cross the heavens and “strike the ball” in the meadow of the sacred Apis bull.

 

Piccione, Peter, “Pharaoh at the Bat,” College of Charlestown Magazine (Spring/Summer 2003), p.36.  From a clipping in the Giamatti Center’s Origins File  Note:  It would be good to confirm details in an academic source and to see whether Egyptologists have any other interpretations of this text.  Caution:  David Block [Baseball Before We Knew It, page 303 (note 1)] writes that Piccione’s comparison of seker-hemat to baseball is seen as “apparently speculative in nature.”

 

BC2000.1 -- 2000 BC to 0 BC – The Ball in Ancient Play

 

Ancient cultures—Lydians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians—play primitive stick and ball games for recreation, fertility rites and religious rituals.

 

Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], pp. 8-21

 

BC2000c.2 – 1913 Text:  Egypt May Be the Birthplace” of Ballplaying

 

“Recent excavations near Cairo, Egypt, have brought to light small balls of leather and others of wood obviously used in some outdoor sport, and probably dating back to at least 2000 years before Christ.  These may be the oldest balls in existence.  Hence Egypt maybe the birthplace of the original ball game whatever it was.  We know, however that the Greeks and Romans played ball at a remote period.  We do not know the exact nature of any of these ancient games, Egyptian, Greek, or Roman.”

 

William S. Walsh, A Handy Book of Curious Information, (J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1913), page 83.  .  Available via Google Books search “to light small balls,”  1/27/2010.  Query:  Does recent scholarship agree that these were balls, were used in sport, and date to 2000BC?  Is there further evidence about their role in Egyptian life?

 

BC1500C.1 – 1500 to 700 BC -- Mexican Game Believed to Use Rubber Ball, Bat

 

According to SABR member César González, “There are remains of rubber balls found since the time of the Olmeca culture between 1500 and 700 BC.”  He reports that it is believed that one of the earliest Mesoamerican games was played with a stick.

 

Email from César González, 12/6/2008 Note: Can we add sources for these points?

 

BC1460.1 – Egyptian Tomb Inscriptions Show Bats, Balls

 

Wall inscriptions in Egyptian royal tombs depict games using bats and balls.

 

According to Egyptologist Peter Piccione, “A wall relief at the temple of Deir et-Bahari showing Thutmose III playing under the watchful eye of the goddess Hathor dates to 1460 BC.  Priests are depicted catching the balls . . .  this was really a game.”

 

Per Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], p. 20.  Note: Henderson’s source may be his ref 127, Naville, E., “The Temple of Deir el Bahari (sic),” Egyptian Exploration Fund. Memoirs, Volume 19, part IV, plate C [London, 1901]. ]. Also, Batting the Ball, by Peter A. Piccione, “Pharaoh at the Bat,” College of Charlestown Magazine (Spring/Summer 2003), p.36.  See also http://www.cofc.edu/~piccione/sekerhemat.html, as accessed 12/17/08.

 

BC750.1 -- 750 BC to 150 AD -- Ballplay in Ancient Greece

 

The Greeks, famous for their athletics, played several ball games.  In fact the Greek gymnasium ["palaistra”] was often known to include a special room [“sphairiteria”] for ballplaying . . . a “sphaira” being a ball.  Pollux [ca 180 AD] lists a number of children’s ball games, including games that loosely resemble very physical forms of keepaway and rugby, and the playing of a complicated form of catch, one that involved feints to deceive other players.

 

The great physician Galen wrote [ca. 180 AD] especially fondly of ballplaying and its merits, and seems to have seen it as an adult activity.  He advised that “the most strenuous form of ball playing is in no way inferior to other exercises.”  Turning to milder forms of ball play, he said “I believe that in this form ball playing is also superior to all the other exercises.”  His partiality to ballplaying stemmed in part from its benefit for the whole body, not just the legs or arms, as was the case for running and wrestling.

 

As far as we are aware, Greek ball games did not include any that involved running among bases or safe havens, or any that involved hitting a ball with a club or stick (or hands).

 

Source:  Stephen G. Miller, Arete: Greek Sports from Ancient Sources, [University of California Press, 2004]: See especially Chapter 9, “Ball Playing.”  The Pollox quote is from pp 124-125, and the Galen quote is from pp. 121-124.  Special thanks to Dr. Miller for his assistance.

 

BC700C.1 – Pitching in the Bible?

 

”He will surely wind you around and around, and throw you like a ball into a large country.  There you will die . . . “   Isaiah 22:18.

 

The word “ball” appears only twice in the Bible, and the lesser one refers to the ball of the foot of a beast [Leviticus 11:27].  The Isaiah  usage was the inspiration for a January 1905 news article headed, “Played Baseball in Bible Times: The Prophet Isaiah Made the only reference to the Pastime to be Found in the Holy Writ.”  [The Hamilton [Ont] Spectator – from a clipping in the Origins file at the Giamatti Center in Cooperstown.]  

 

Isaiah’s prophesies were written [in Hebrew] late in the eighth century BC.  A compilation of 15 English translations [accessed at http://bible.cc/isaiah/22-18.htm on 12/29/10] shows that most of them summon the image of an angry God hurling the miscreant, like a ball, far far away.  [One exception, however, cites a wound turban, not a ball.]  A literal translation is unrevealing: “And thy coverer covering, wrapping round, Wrappeth thee round, O babbler, On a land broad of sides – there thou diest.”  Caveat: we have little assurance that Isaiah actually referred to a ball, or even to the act of throwing. Query:  could a Hebrew reader or a Bible scholar among you clarify this question?

 

BC 100.1 – Historian Dates Early Cricket to 100BC – Others Disagree

 

In his 1912 article “The History of Cricket” [in Pelham and Warner, Imperial Cricket (London, 1912), p. 54] Andrew Lang “argued that cricket was played as far back as 100 BC, basing this on evidence supposedly provided by the ancient Irish epics and romances.”  According to Lang, “cricket was played by the ancestors of Cuchulain, by the Dalraid Scots from northern Ireland who invaded and annexed Argyll in about 500 AD.”  Modern writers do not accept this view.

 

Bateman, Anthony,” ‘More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ; ‘Culture, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), pp 27 - 44.  Note: It would be interesting to know what particular features of Irish lore gave Lang the feeling that cricket stemmed from ancient Irish sources.

 

370C.1 – Saint Augustine Recalls Punishment for Youthful Ball Games

 

In his Confessions, Augustine of Hippo – later St. Augustine – recalls his youth in Northern Africa, where his father served as a Roman official.  “I was disobedient, not because I chose something better than [my parents and elders] chose for me, but simply from the love of games.  For I liked to score a fine win at sport or to have my ears tickled by the make-believe of the stage.” [Book One, chapter 10].  In Book One, chapter 9, Augustine had explained that “we enjoyed playing games and were punished for them by men who played games themselves.  However, grown up games are known as ‘business. . . .  Was the master who beat me himself very different from me?  If he were worsted by a colleague in some petty argument, he would be convulsed in anger and envy, much more so that I was when a playmate beat me at a game of ball.”

 

Saint Augustine’s Confessions, Book One, text supplied by Dick McBane, February 2008.  Note: Can historians identify the “game of ball” that Augustine might have played in the fourth Century?  Are the translations to “game of ball,” “games,” and “sport” still deemed accurate?        

 

640s.1 – Medieval Writer:  Saint Cuthbert [b. 634c] “Pleyde atte balle”

 

Mulling on whether the ball came to England in Anglo-Saxon days, Strutt reports “the author of a manuscript in Trinity College, Oxford, written in the fourteenth century and containing the life of Saint Cuthbert, says of him, that when young, ‘he pleyde atte balle with the children that his felawes [fellows] were.’  On what authority this information is established I cannot tell.”  Strutt, The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England, (Chatto and Windus, London, 1898 edition), page 158.

 

Note: The claim of this unidentified manuscript seems weak.  As Strutt notes, the venerable Bede wrote poetic and prose accounts of the life of Cuthbert around 715-720 A.D., and made no mention of ballplaying.  That a scholar would find evidence seven centuries later would be surprising. Warton later cites the poem as from Oxford MSS number Ivii, and he also places its unidentified author in the fourteenth century, but he doesn’t the veracity of the story line.  The poem describes an angel sent from heaven to dissuade Cuthbert from playing such an “ydell” [idle] pastime.  Warton, Thomas, The History of English Poetry from the Close of the Eleventh Century to the Commencement of the Eighteenth Century (Thomas Tegg, London, 1840, from the 1824 edition), volume 1, page 14.

 

824.1 -- 15-Year-Old Chinese Emperor Criticized for Excessive Ball-playing

 

Ching Tsung, was the new Chinese emperor at the age of 15.  “As soon as he could escape from the morning levee, the young Emperor rushed off to play ball.  His habits were well known in the city, and in the summer of 824 someone suggested to a master-dyer named Chang Shao that, as a prank, he should slip into the Palace, lie on the Emperor’s couch and eat his dinner, ‘for nowadays he is always away, playing ball or hunting.’”  The prank was carried out, but those prankish dyers . . . well, they died as a result.

 

Waaey, Arthur, The Life and Times of Po Chu-I, 772-846 [Allen and Unwin, London, 1949], page 157.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

900.1 – Mayan Games Played at Chichen Itza, Mexico

 

Mayan Indians play stick and ball games in ceremonial courts in Chichen Itza, Mexico

 

Note: This source may be Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], p. 201.  And Henderson’s source may be his ref 53, Effler, L. R., The Ruins of Chichen Itza [Toledo, Ohio], pp 19 – 21.  However, Henderson’s Effler ref. shows no publisher, and Henderson’s account of the game played at Chichen Itza is not dated to 900 AD, or connected with a stick, so another source may be preferable.

 

1000C.1 – “Batting” Games in Germany?

 

Is his 1941 paper “Battingball Games” [Reprinted as Appendix 6 in Block, Baseball Before We Knew it, pp. 261 ff], Per Maigaard wrote:

“The oldest complete account of a Battingball game is that of Gutsmuth in 1796.  From older times we only hear about Batting without further explanation, the oldest being from the 11th century in Germany.”  Baseball Before We Knew It, page 274.  Maigaard does not cite a source for this early reference.  Query: do we now know what it was?

The original source for Maigaard’s paper is given as Genus, volume 5 (December 1941), pages 57-72.  The paper traces the evolution and typology of batting/running games like rounders and longball, which Maigaard sees as having taken advanced form in Europe.

1086.1 – Form of Stool Ball Possibly Found in Domesday Book in Norman England

Stool ball, a stick and ball game and a forerunner of rounders and cricket, is apparently mentioned in the Domesday Book as “bittle-battle.”

Note: This source is Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], p. 75.  However, Henderson doesn’t exactly endorse the idea that the cited game, “bittle-battle,” is a ball game, [or if it is, could it be a form of soule?]  He says that one [unnamed] author claims that bittle-battle is a form of stoolball.  I saw only two RH refs to stoolball, ref 72 [Grantham] and ref 149 [London Magazine].  One of them may be Henderson’s source for the 1086 stoolball claim.  I don’t see an RH ref to the Domesday text itself, but then, it probably isn’t found at local lending libraries.  The Dictionary of the Sussex Dialect [1875] reportedly gives “bittle-battle” as another name for stoolball.  It is believed that “bittle” meant a wooden milk bowl and some have speculated that a bowl may have been used as a paddle to deflect a thrown ball from the target stool, while others speculate that the bowl may have been the target itself.

Note:  We need to confirm whether the Domesday Book actually uses the term “bittle-battle,” “stool ball,” or what.  We also should try to ascertain views of professional scholars on the interpretations of the Book.  Martin Hoerchner advises that the British Public Records Office may, at some point, make parts of the Domesday Book available online.

1100s.1 – “Pagan” Ball Rites Observed in France in 1100s and 1200s

 

Henderson:  “The testimony of Beleth and Durandus, both eminently qualified witnesses, clearly indicates that in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries the ball had found a place for itself in the Easter celebrations of the Church.”  In fact, Beleth and Durandus had both opposed the practice, seeing it as the intrusion of pagan rites into church rites.  “There are some Churches in which it is customary for the Bishops and Archbishops to play in the monasteries with those under them, even to stoop to the game of ball” [Beleth, 1165].  “In certain places in our country, prelates play games with their own clerics on Easter in the cloisters, or in the Episcopal Palaces, even so far as to descend to the game of ball”  [Durandus, 1286].

 

Note: This source appears to be Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], p. 37-38.  Page 37 refers to an 1165 prohibition and page 38 mentions 12th and 13th Century Easter rites.  Henderson identifies two sources for the page 38 statement:  Beleth, J., “Rationale Divinorum Officiorum,” in Migne, J. P., Patrologiae Curius Completus, Ser 2, Vol. 106, pp. 575-591 [Paris, 1855], and Durandus, G., “Rationale Divinorum Officiorum,” Book VI, Ch 86, Sect. 9 [Rome, 1473]...Henderson does not say that these rites involved the use of sticks.

1189.1 – “Unconfirmed” Report of a Stoolball Reference by Iscanus

There is “an unconfirmed report which was published in the beginning of the Century quoting one Joseph Iscanus, of Exeter, as having referred to stoolball in 1189, but no satisfactory evidence that this quotation was genuine.” 

National Stoolball Association, “A Brief History of Stoolball,” page 2.  This mimeo, available in NSA files, has no date or author, but has one internal reference to an 1989 source, so it must be fairly recent.  It contains no hint on the source of the 1189 claim or how it has been assessed. Note:  Is it now possible to further pursue this claim using online resources?  The 1189 claim appears nowhere else in available writings about stoolball.

However, some cite a Joseph Iscanus couplet: “The youth at cricks did play/Throughout the livelong day/” as an indicator of early cricket.  However, the online source of this rhyme does not give a source.  Very murky, no?  Query: what do leading cricket historians say of this alleged reference?

1200s.1 – Bat and Ball Game Illustration Appears in English Genealogical Roll

 

“The [1301 -- see below] illustration is a very early depiction of the game we know as baseball, but it’s probably not the first.  In 1964, a writer named Harry Simmons cited an English bat and ball picture from a genealogical roll of the Kings of England up to Henry III, who died in 1269.”

 

Baltimore Sun article on the Ghistelle Calendar [see entry for 1301] April 6, 1999, page 1E.

 

1205.1 -- “Ball” Rolls into the English Language

 

Scholars report that the Chronicle of Britain [1205] contained the words “Summe heo driuen balles wide . . .” which they see as “the first known use of the word ball in the sense of a globular body that is played with.”  The source? Old Norse, by way of Middle English.  [Old High German had used ballo and pallo, but the English didn’t use “ball” in those days.]  The source does not say whether people in England used some other term for their rolling playthings prior to 1205.

 

Source: Wikipedia entry on “ball,” accessed 5/31/2006.

 

1255.1 – Spanish Painting Seen as Earliest Depiction of Ballplaying

 

The book Spain: A History in Art [Date? Publisher?] includes a plate that appears to show “several representations of baseball figures and some narrative.”  The work is dated to 1255, the period of King Alfonso.

 

Email from Ron Gabriel, July 10, 2007.  Ron also has supplied a quality color photocopy of this plate, which was the subject of his presentation at the 1974 SABR convention.  Note: can we specify the painting and its creator?  Can we learn how baseball historians and others interpret this artwork?

 

1299.1 – Prince of Wales Plays “Creag,” Seen By Some as a Cricket Precursor

 

Cashman, Richard, “Cricket,” in David Levinson and Karen Christopher, Encyclopedia of World Sport: From Ancient Times to the Present [Oxford University Press, 1996], page 87.

 

1300s.1 – Trapball Played in the British Isles

 

Trevithick, Alan, “Trapball,” in David Levinson and Karen Christopher, Encyclopedia of World Sport: From Ancient Times to the Present [Oxford University Press, 1996], page 421.

 

1300s.2 – Edward III Prohibits Playing of Club-Ball.

 

“The recreations prohibited by proclamation in the reign of Edward III, exclusive of the games of chance, are thus specified; the throwing of stones, wood, or iron; playing at hand-ball, foot-ball, club-ball, and camucam, which I take to have been a species of goff . . . .” Edward III reigned from 1327 to 1377.  The actual term for “club-ball” in the proclamation was, evidently, “bacculoream.”

 

This appears to be one of only two direct references to “club-ball” in the literature.  See #1794.2, below.

 

Caveat:  David Block argues that, contrary to Strutt’s contention [see #1801.1, below], club ball may not be the common ancestor of cricket and other ballgames.  See David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, pages 105-107 and 183-184.  Block says that “pilam bacculoream” translates as “ball play with a stick or staff.”  Note: We seem not to really know what “camucam” was.  Nor, of course, how club ball was played, since the term could have denoted a form of tennis or field hockey or and early form of stoolball or cricket.  It’s odd that no specific year is assigned to this proclamation, and that Strutt cites no reference for it.

 

1300s.3 -- Stoolball Said to Originate Among Sussex Milkmaids

“Stoolball is a ball game that dates back to the 14th century, originating in Sussex [in southern England]   It may be an ancestor of cricket (a game it resembles), baseball, and rounders. Traditionally it was played be milkmaids who used their milking stools as ‘wickets.’ . . . “Later forms of the game involved running between two wickets, but “[o]riginally the batsman simply had to defend his stool from each ball with his hand and would score a point for each delivery until the stool was hit.  The game later evolved to include runs and bats.”

Source: Wikipedia entry on “Stoolball,” accessed 1/25/2007.  Note: this source does not credit bittle-battle [see entry 1086.1] as an earlier form of stoolball.  It gives no citations for the evidence of the founding date. The Wikipedia entry is compatible with entry #1330.1, below, but evidently does not credit 1330 as the likely time of stoolball’s appearance.

1301.1 – Ghistelles Calendar Depicts Vigorous-Looking Bat/Ball Game

 

A manuscript obtained in 1999 by the Walters Art Gallery in Baltimore appears to show a batted-ball game played by two young persons.  The manuscript, called the Calendar of the Ghistelles Hours, dates from 1301. It is a small monthly calendar of saints’ days from a monastery in the town of Ghistelles, in southwestern Flanders.  The illustration is for the month of September.

 

Schoettler, Carl, “The Old, Old, Old Ball Game,” Baltimore Sun, April 6 1999, page 1E.

 

1310.1 – Documents Said to Describe Baseball-like Romanian Game of Oina

 

According to an otherwise unidentified clip in the Origins file at the Giamatti Center, an AP article datelined Bucharest Romania [and which appeared in the Oneonta Times on March 29, 1990], the still popular Romanian game of oina can be traced back to a [unspecified] document dating to the year 1310.  The game itself “was invented by shepherds in the first century.”

 

The article is evidently based on an interview with Cristian Costescu, who sees baseball as “the American pastime derived from the ancient game of oina.”  Oina reportedly has eleven players per side, an all-out-side-out rule, tossed pitches, nine bases describing a total basepath of 120 yards, plugging of baserunners, the opportunity for the fielding side to score points, and a bat described as similar to a cricket bat.  Costescu is reported to have served as head of the Romanian Oina Federation in the years when baseball was banned in Romania as “a capitalist sport.”

 

The Oneonta Times headline is “Play Oina!  Romanians Say Their Game Inspired Creation of Baseball.”  Note:  Can we find additional documentation of oina’s rules and history?  Is the 1310 documentation available in English translation?  Have others followed the recent fate of oina and the work of Costescu?

 

 

1310c.2 – A Drawing of “A Game of Ball,” with a Player in a Batting Pose

 

A 1915 book on ancient British schools includes a drawing dated circa 1310.  It shows two players, one clad in a garment with broad horizontal stripes.  Both players hold clubs, and the player in stripes appears ready to swing at a melon-sized ball.  The other player appears to be preparing to fungo the ball . . . or, conceivably, toss it with his left hand, to the striped player.  The illustration’s caption is “A Game of Ball, Stripes vs. Plain, c. 1310.”  The British Museum’s documentation: MS Royal 10 E. iv, f. 94 b. 

 

Posted by Mark Aubrey to the 19CBB listserve on 1/10/2008.  The 1915 source, available in full text on Google Books, is A. F. Leach, The Schools of Medieval England (Macmillan, New York, 1915), on the unnumbered page following p. 140.

 

1330.1 – Vicar of Winkfield Advises Against Bat/Ball Games in Churchyards; First Stoolball Reference?

 

“Stoolball was played in England as early as 1330, when William Pagula, Vicar of Winkfield, near Windsor, wrote in Latin a poem of instructions to parish priests, advising them to forbid the playing of all games of ball in churchyards: “Bats and bares and suche play/Out of chyrche-yorde put away.”

 

Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], p. 74.  Note: The Vicar’s caution was translated in 1450 by a Canon, John Myrc.  Henderson’s ref 120 is Mirk [sic], J., “Instructions to Parish Priests,” Early English Text Society, Old Series 31, p. 11 [London, 1868].  A contemporary of Myrc in 1450 evidently identified the Vicar’s targets as including stoolball.  Block [p. 165] identifies the original author as William de Pagula.  Writing in 1886, T. L. Kington Oliphant identifies “bares” as prisoner’s base:  “There is the term “bace pleye,” whence must come the “prisoner’s base;” this in Myrc had appeared as the game of “bares.”  Kington Oliphant does not elaborate on this claim, and does not comment on the accompanying term “bats” in the original.  The 1886 reference was provided by John Thorn, 2/24/2008

 

1344.1 -- Manuscript Shows a Club-and-Ball Game with Stool-like Object

 

“A manuscript of 1344 in the Bodleian Library at Oxford (No. 264) shows a game of club and ball.  One player throws that ball to another who holds a vicious-looking club.  He defends a round object which resembles a stool but with a base instead of legs. . . ”  “In the course of time a second stool was added, which obviously made a primitive form of cricket.  Now a stool was also called a “cricket” and it is possible that the name cricket came from the three-legged stool . . . “ “We may summarize: The game and name of cricket stem back to ancient games played with a curved stick and ball, starting with la soule, and evolving in England through stoolball . . .”

 

Henderson, Robert W., Ball, Bat and Bishop: The Origins of Ball Games [Rockport Press, 1947], pp. 130-131.  Henderson's ref 17 is Bodleian Library, Douce MSS 264, ff 22, 44, 63.  Cox’s 1903 edition of Strutt includes this drawing and its reference.  Note: do other observers agree with Henderson on whether and how stoolball evolved into cricket?

 

1363.1 -- Englishmen Forbidden to Play Ball; Archery Much Preferred

 

Edward III wrote to the Sheriff of Kent, and evidently sheriffs throughout England.  Noting a relative neglect of the useful art of archery, the King said he was thereby, on festival days, “forbidding, all and single, on our orders, to toy in any way with these games of throwing stones, wood, or iron, playing handball, football, “stickball,” or hockey, . . . which are worthless, under pain of imprisonment.”  The translator uses “stickball” as a translation of the Latin ”pila cacularis,” and asks it that might have been an early form of cricket.  We might also ask whether it was referring to early stoolball.

 

A. R. Myers, English Historical Documents (Routledge, 1996), page 1203.  [Viewed online 10/16/08].  Provided in email from John Thorn, 2/27/2008.  Myers’ citation is “Rymer, Foedera, III, ii, from Close Roll, 37 Edward III [Latin].”

 

Caveat:  The content of this entry resembles that of #1300s.2 above, and both refer to a restriction imposed by Edward III. However that entry, stemming from Strutt, refers to “club-ball” instead of “stick-ball,” and identifies the Latin as “pilam bacculoream,” not “pila cacularis.”  It is possible that both refer to the same source.  Also: the letter to Kent is elsewhere dated 1365, which could be consistent with Edward III’s 37th year under the crown, but Myers uses 1363.

 

Note: this entry replaces the former entry #1365.1: “In 1365 the sheriffs had to forbid able-bodied men playing ball games as, instead, they were to practice archery on Sundays and holidays.”  Source: Hassall, W. O., [compiler], “How They Lived: An Anthology of Original Accounts Written Before 1485” [Blackwell, Oxford University Press, 1962], page 285.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

1385.1 -- English Boys Play Ball “To the Grave Peril of Their Souls”

 

A letter written by Robert Braybroke laid out the palpable risks of ball-playing:  “Certain [boys], also, good for nothing in their insolence and idleness, instigated by evil minds and busying themselves rather in doing harm than good, throw and shoot stones, arrows, and different kinds of missiles at the rooks, pigeons, and other birds nesting in the walls and porches of the church and perching [there].  Also they play ball inside and outside the church and engage in other destructive games there, breaking and greatly damaging the glass windows and the stone images of the church . . . This they do not without great offense to God and our church and to the prejudice and  injury or us as well as to the grave peril of their souls.”  And the sanction for such play?  “We . . . proclaim solemnly that any malefactors whatever of this kind [including churchyard merchants as well as young ballplayers] whom it is possible to catch in the aforesaid actions after this our warning have been and are excommunicated . . . .”

 

Crow, Martin M., and Clair C. Olson, eds., “Chaucer’s World” [Columbia University Press, New York, 1948], pp 48-49.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

1393.1 – Disconfirmed Poetry Lines Said to Denote Stoolball in Sussex

 

According to a 2007 article in a Canadian magazine, there is poetry in which a milkmaid calls to another, “Oi, Rosie, coming out to Potter’s field for a whack at the old stool?”  The article continues:  “The year was 1393. The place was Sussex . . .  the game was called stoolball, which was probably a direct descendant of stump-ball”

 

The article, by  Ruth Tendulkar, is titled “The Great-Grandmother of Baseball and Cricket,” and appeared in the May/June 2007 issue of The Canadian Newcomers Magazine.  We have been unable to find addition source details from the author or the magazine. 

 

Sourcehttp://www.cnmag.ca, as accessed 9/6/2007. 

 

Caution: The editor of The Canadian Newcomers Magazine informed us on 1/10/2088 that the Tendulkar piece “was strictly an entertainment piece rather than an academic piece.”  We take this to say that the verse is not authentic.  Email from Dale Sproule, Publisher/Editor.

 

1450.1 -- John Myrc Repeats Warning Against Ball Play in the Churchyard, Including “Stoil Ball”

 

David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It [page 165], cites the Myrc work, “early poetic instruction of priests,” as “How thow schalt thy paresche preche,” London. It warns “Bal and bares and suche play/ Out of chyrcheyorde put a-way.”  A note reportedly inserted by another author included among the banned games “tenessyng handball, fott ball stoil ball and all manner other games out churchyard.”  Note: can we determine when the “other author” wrote in “stoil ball?  This may count as the first time “stool ball” [virtually] appeared.

 

1450.2 – Stoolball Dated by NSA to 1450 in “Don Quixote”

 

“[Stoolball] is mentioned in the classic book Don Quixote.”

 

Source: NSA website, accessed April 2007.  Note: we need a fuller citation and the key text.  It is possible that this entry confuses D’Urfey’s 1694 play about Don Quixote [see Entry #1694.1, below] with the Cervantes masterpiece.

 

1470c.1 –Editor Sees Stoolball in Verse on Bachelorhood

 

“In al this world nis a murier lyf/Thanne is a yong man wythouten a wyf,/For he may lyven wythouten strif/In every place wher-so he go.

 

“In every place he is loved over alle/Among maydens grete and smale-/In daunsyng, in pipyngs, and rennyng at the balle,/In every place wher-so he go.

 

“They leten lighte by housebonde-men/Whan they at the balle renne;/They casten ther love to yonge men/In every place wher-so they go.

 

“Then seyn maydens, "Farewel, Jakke,/Thy love is pressed al in thy pak;/Thou berest thy love bihynde thy back,/In every place wher-so thou go."

 

Robert Stevick, ed., One Hundred Middle English Lyrics (U of Illinois Press, 1994), page 141.    Posted to 19CBB on 11/14/2008 by Richard Hershberger.  Richard reports that Stevick dates this poem -- #81 of the 100 collected in this volume -- to c. 1470. He interprets the lyric’s ‘running at the ball’ as ‘stool ball, probably,’ but stow ball [resembling field hockey] seems apter.  Richard also points out that “for the sake of precision, it should be noted that this volume is intended for student use and normalizes the spellings.”

 

1477.1 – List of Banned Games May Include Distant Ancestors of Cricket?

 

A Westminster statute, made to curb gambling by rowdy soldiers upon their return from battle, reportedly imposed sanctions for “playing at cloish, ragle, half-bowls, handyn and handoute, quekeborde, and if any person permits even others to play at such games in his house or yard, he is to be imprisoned for three years; as also he who plays at such game, to  forfeit ten pounds to the king, and be imprisoned for two years.”

 

Observations Upon the Statutes, Chiefly the More Ancient, from Magna Charta to the Twenty-first [Year] of James the First (London, 1766), page 335.  Query: is the author known?

 

The 1766 author adds: “This is, perhaps, the most severe law which has ever been made in any country against gaming, and some of the forbidden sports seem to have been manly exercises, particularly the handing and handoute, which I should suppose to be a kind of cricket, as the term hands is still retained in that game [for what would later be known as innings] 

 

An1864 writer expands further:  “Half-bowls was played with pins and one-half of a sphere of wood, upon the floor of a room.  It is said to be still played in Hertfordshire under the name of rolly-polly.  Hand-in and hand-out was a ring-game, played by boys and girls, like kissing-ring [footnote 31].” John Harland, A Volume of Court Leet Records of the Manor of Manchester in the Sixteenth Century (Chetham Society, 1864), page 34.  Accessed 1/27/10 via Google Books search (“court leet” half-bowls).  “Roly-poly” and hand-in/hand-out are sometimes later described as having running/plugging features preserved in cat games and early forms of base ball. Thus, these prohibitions may or may not include games resembling baseball.  Query:  Can residents of Britain help us understand this ancient text?

 

1478.1 – Du Cange Mentions “Criquet” Game in his Glossary

 

While others see cricket as taking its name from the term for a staff, or stick, “[T]he famous New English Dictionary favors a word used as a [game’s] target: criquet,  Du Cange quotes this word in a manuscript of 1478: ‘The suppliant came to a place where a game of ball (jeu de boule) was played, near to a stick (attaché) or criquet,’  and defines criquet as ‘a stick which serves as a target in a ball game.’”

 

Du Cange, Glossarium Mediae ET Infimae Latinatis [Paris, 1846], Vol. 4: Mellat, Vol. 5” Pelotas.  Per Henderson ref 48.

 

1478.2 – Parliament Speaks:  Jail or Fine for Unlawful Gameplaying

 

An Act of Parliament forbade unlawful games as conducive to disorder and as discouraging the practice of archery.  The games that were forbidden, under penalty of two years’ imprisonment or a fine of ten pounds, were these: quoits, football, closh, kails, half-bowls, hand-in and hand-out, chequer-board.

 

This Act is cited as Rot. Parl. VI, 188.  Information provided by John Thorn, email of 2/27/2008.

 

Caveat: The list of proscribed games is similar to the Edward III’s prohibition [see #1363.1 above] adding “hand-in and hand-out” in place of agame translated as “club-ball” or “stick-ball.  We are uncertain as to whether hand-in and hand-out is the ancestor of a safe-haven game.

 

1494c.1 -- Christopher Columbus and the Coefficient of Restitution

 

“When Christopher Columbus revisited Haiti on his second voyage, he observed some natives playing with a ball.  The men who came with Columbus to conquer the Indies had brought their Castilian windballs to play with in idle hours.  But at once they found that the balls of Haiti were incomparably superior; they bounced better.  These high-bouncing balls were made, they learned, from a milky fluid of the consistency of honey which the natives procured by tapping certain trees and then cured over the smoke of palm nuts. A discovery which improved the delights of ball games was noteworthy.”  350 years later, after Goodyear discovered vulcanization [1839], “India rubber” balls were to be identified with the New York game of baseball. 

 

Holland Thompson, “Charles Goodyear and the History of Rubber,” at http://inventors.about.come/cs/inventorsalphabet/a/rubber_2.htm, accessed 1/24/2007.  Note: We need better sources for the Columbus story.  And: what were “Castilian windballs?”

 

 

1500s.1 -- Ballplaying Permitted at College of Tours in France, if Done ‘Cum Silentio’

 

“Parisian legislators were more sympathetic with regard to games than their English contemporaries.  Even the Founder of the Cisterian College of St Bernard contemplated that permission might be obtained for games, though not before dinner or after the bell rang for vespers.  A sixteenth century code of statutes for the College of Tours, while recording the complaints of the neighbors about the noise made by the scholars playing ball (‘de insolentiis, exclamationibus et ludis palmariis dictorum scholarium, qui ludent . . . pilis durissimis’) permitted the game under less noisy conditions (‘pilis seu scopes mollibus et manu, ac cum silentio et absque clamoribus tumultuosis.’)

 

Rait, Robert S., Life in the Medieval University [Cambridge University Press, 1912], page 83.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

1500s.2 – Queen Elizabeth’s Dudley Plays Stoolball at Wotton Hill?

 

According to a manuscript written in the 1600s, Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester and his “Trayne”  “came to Wotton, and thence to Michaelwood Lodge . . . and thence went to Wotton Hill, where hee paid a match at stobball.”

Note:  Is it possible to determine the approximate date of this event?  Queen Elizabeth I named her close associate [once rumored to be her choice as husband] Dudley to became Earl of Leicester in the 1564, and he died in 1588. The Wotton account was written by John Smyth of Nibley somewhere in his Berkeley Manuscripts.  He have no citation for that work.  Smyth’s association with Berkeley Castle began n 1589, and the Manuscripts were written in about 1618, so it it not a first-hand report.   Caveat: “Stobbal” is usually used to denote a field game resembling field hockey or golf; thus, this account may not relate to stoolball per se.

1523.1 – Baron’s Trespass Records Mention Stoball

“Item, quod petrus frankeleyne vid posuit iiiixx ovesin le stoball field contra ordinacionem.”

Source: National Stoolball Association, “A Brief History of Stoolball,” [mimeo, author and date unspecified], page 2.  This wording is reportedly found in “an extract from the rolls of the Court Baron of the Royal Manor of Kirklington, belonging to the Duchy of Lancaster (16th Century), under the heading of trespass.”  Note: We need a citation here, and a reason for assigning the 1523 date.  The relation of stoball to stoolball remains under dispute, with many observers seeing stoball as an early golf-like game.  Can we obtain a good translation and interpretation of this quotation?

1533.1 – Skelton Poem Traces Cricket to Flemish Immigrants?

 

“O lodre of Ipocrites/ Nowe shut vpp your wickets,/ And clappe to your clickettes/ A! Farewell, kings for crekettes!”

 

“The Image of Ipocrisie” (1533) attributed to John Skelton.  This verse is interpreted as showing no sympathy to Flemish weavers who settled in southern and eastern England, bringing at least the rudiments of cricket with them. Heiner Gillmeister and John Campbell noted publicly in June 2009 that this is relevant evidence of cricket’s non-English origin.  Note: the first written reference to cricket was nearly 70 years in the future in 1533.  Contributed by Beth Hise, January 12, 2010. Query: are cricket historians accepting this poem as valid evidence of cricket's roots?

 

1538.1 -- Easter Ball Play at Churches Ends in France

 

“Certain types of ball games had a prominent place in heathen rituals and were believed to promote fertility.  Even after Christianity had gained the ascendancy over the older religion, ball continued to be played in the churchyard and even within the church at certain times.  In France, ball was played in churches at Easter, until the custom was abolished in 1538.  In England, the practice persisted up to a much later date.”

 

Brewster, Paul G., American Nonsinging Games [University of Oklahoma Press, Norman OK, 1953] pp. 79-89.  Submitted by John Thorn, 6/6/04.  Brewster gives no source for the French dictum, nor for the “later date” when Easter play ceased in England.

 

1540.1 – A Pitcher, a Catcher and a Batter in a Golf History Book?

 

Cary Smith [ZinnBeck@aol.com] has noted an alluring illustration in a 1540 publication, and we seek additional input on it.  In a posting to the 19CBB listserve in March 2008, Cary wrote:

 

“On the British Library web site in the turning pages section there is a book called the Golf Book, but it is labeled as ‘Flemish Masters in Miniature.’  On page seven of the book there is a small grisalle border at the bottom.  It looks like what today would be considered a pitcher, catcher, and batter.  The book is from 1540.  To access the web site you will need to have Flash running.  If on a Macintosh that is intel based you will need to click the Rosetta button in the info window of your web browser.”  Note: can you help us interpret this artwork?

 

The URL is http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/ttp/ttpbooks.html.

 

 

1550.1 – No English Reference Claimed for the Word ”Cricket” Found Before 1550

 

“The medieval origin of the national game of the English is beyond doubt, but not so its Island roots.  There would have been ample opportunity for it to figure on the lists of banned games set out by their kings, but there is no written mention of it before 1550.  It is, of course, not impossible that its forerunner was one of the many ball games played with unidentifiable rules, as for instance club ball.”

 

From an unidentified photocopy in the “Origins of Baseball” file at the Giamatti Center at Cooperstown.  Note: the inconsistencies among the preceding cricket entries [see #1478.1,] need to be resolved . . . . or at least addressed.

 

 

1550c.2 – Cricket Play Recalled at Southern England School

 

[Cf #1598.3 below.]  A 1598 trial in the Surrey town of Guildford includes a statement by John Derrick, then aged 59.  According to a 1950 history of Guildford’s Royal Grammar School, “[H]e stated that he had known the [disputed] ground for fifty years or more and that ‘when he was a scholar in the free school of Guildford, he and several of his fellows did run and play there at cricket and other plays.’  This is believed to be the first recorded mention of cricket.”

 

Brown, J. F., The Story of the Royal Grammar School, Guildford, 1950, page 6.  Note: it would be interesting to see the original reference, and to know how 1550 was chosen as the reported year of play.

 

1555c.1 -- English Poet Condones Students’ Yens “To Tosse the Ball, To Rene Base, Like Men of War”

 

“To shote, to bowle, or caste the barre,

To play tenise, or tosse the ball,

Or to rene base, like men of war,

Shall hurt thy study naught at all.”

 

Crowley, Robert, “The Scholar’s Lesson,” circa 1555, in J. M. Cowper, The Select Works of Robert Crowley [N. Truber, London, 1872], page 73.  Submitted by John Bowman, 7/16/2004.  Citation from Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, see pages 230 and 312.

 

1562.1 --  Cricket Forerunner an “Unlawful Game?”

 

The Malden Corporation Court Book of 1562 contains a charge against John Porter alias Brown, and a servant, for ‘playing an unlawful game called “clycett.”’”

 

Brookes, Christopher, English Cricket: the Game and its Players Through the Ages (Newton Abbot, 1978), page 16, as cited in Bateman, Anthony,“’More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 29.

1564.1 – Formal Complaint in Surrey: Stoolball is Played on Sunday

“1564 – complaints were made to the justices sitting at the midsummer session, at Malden, Surrey, that the constable (himself possibly an enthusiast with the stool and ball) suffered stoolball to be played on Sunday.”

M. S. Russell-Goggs, “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 318.  Surrey is the adjoining county to Sussex.  Note: we need to locate the full citations for this and all other Russell-Goggs references. 

1565.1 -- Bruegel’s “Corn Harvest” Painting Shows Meadow Ballgame 

 

“We had paused right in front of [the Flemish artist] Bruegel the Elder’s “Corn Harvest” (1565), one of the world’s great paintings of everyday life . . .  .[M]y eye fell upon a tiny tableau at the left-center of the painting in which young men appeared to be playing a game of bat and ball in a meadow distant from the scything and stacking and dining and drinking that made up the foreground. . . . There appeared to be a man with a bat, a fielder at a base, a runner, and spectators as well as participants in waiting.  The strange device opposite the batsman’s position might have been a catapult.  As I was later to learn with hurried research, this detain is unnoted in the art-history studies.”

 

From John Thorn, "Play's the Thing," Woodstock Times, December 28, 2006.  See thornpricks.blogspot.com/2006/12/bruegel-and-me_27.html, accessed 1/30/07.

 

1567.1 -- English Translation of Horace Refers to “the Stoole Ball”

 

“The stoole ball, top, or camping ball/If suche one should assaye/As hath no mannour skill therein,/Amongste a mightye croude,/Theye all would screeke unto the frye/And laugh at hym aloude.”

 

Drant, Thomas, Horace His Arte of Poetrie, Pistles, and Satyrs Englished, and to the Earle of Ormounte, [London], per David Block, page 166.  There is no implication that Horace himself refers to a stool ball.

 

1570c.1 – Five Indicted for Stoolball Play on Sunday

 

“A few years later [than 1564], at the Easter Sessions in the same town [Malden, Surrey], one Edward Anderkyn and four others were indicted for playing stoolball on Sunday.”

 

M. S. Russell-Goggs, “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 318.  Surrey is the adjoining county to Sussex.  Note: we need to locate the full citations for this and all other Russell-Goggs references. 

1575.1 -- Gascoigne’s Poem “The Fruits of War” Refers to Tut-ball

 

Gascoigne, George, The Posies of George Gascoigne Esquire, Corrected, perfected, and augmented by the Authour [London, Richard Smith], per Block, Baseball Before We Knew It,  page 166.  The key lines:  “Yet have I shot at master Bellums butte/And throwen his ball although I toucht no tutte.”

 

1583.1 -- Pre-teens Risk Dungeon Time For Selves, or Their Dads, by Playing Ball

 

“Whereas this a great abuse in a game or games used in the town called “Gede Gadye or the Cat’s Pallet, and Typing or hurling the Ball,” – that no mannor person shall play at the same games, being above the age of seven years, wither in the churchyard or in any of the streets of this town, upon pain of every person so playing being imprisoned in the Doungeon for the space of two hours; or else every person so offending to pay 6 [pence] for every time.  And if they have not [wherewithal] to pay, then the parents or masters of such persons so offending to pay the said 6 [pence] or to suffer the like imprisonment.”  [Similar language is found in 1579 entry [page 148], but it lacked the name “Typing” and did not mention a ball.]

 

John Harland, editor, Court Leet Records of the Manor of Manchester in the Sixteenth Century (Chetham Society, 1864), page 156.  Accessed 1/27/10 via Google Books search: “court leet” half-bowls.  Note:   The game gidigadie is not known to us, but the 1864 editor notes elsewhere [page 149, footnote 61] that was “not unlikely” to be tip-cat, and he interprets “typing” as tipping.  As later described [see “Tip-Cat” and “Pallet” at http://retrosheet.org/Protoball/Glossary.htm], tip-cat could be played with a cat or a ball, and could involve running among holes as bases.  Caveat: we do not yet know what the nature of the proscribed game was in Elizabethan times.

 

 

1585c.1 -- Stoole-ball, Nine Holes Included Among Country Sports

 

In a 1600 publication attributed to Samuel Rowlands [died 1588], the fourth of six “Satires,” presents a catalog of about 30 pastimes, including “play at stoole-ball,” and “play at nine-holes.”  Other diversions include pitching the barre, foote-ball, play at base, and leap-frog.

 

Rowlands, Samuel, The Letting of Humour’s blood in the head-vein (W. White, London, 1600), as discussed in Brydges, Samuel E., Censura Literaria (Longman, London, 1808), p.279.  Virtually the same long verse – but one that carelessly lists stoole-ball twice -- is attributed to “Randal Holme of Chester” in an 1817 book:  Drake, Nathan, Shakspeare and His Times (Cadell and Davies, London, 1817), pages 246-247.  Drake does not suggest a date for this verse.  Caveat: Our choice of 1585 as the year of Rowlands’ composition is merely speculative.  Note:  This entry needs to be reconciled with #1630c.1 below.

 

1586.1 – Sydney Cites Stoolball

 

“A time there is for all, my mother often sayes/

When she with skirts tuckt very hie, with gyrles at stoolball playes”

 

[Sir Philip?] Sydney, Arcadia: Sonnets [1622], page 493.  Note: citation needs confirmation.

 

1586.2 – Possible Early Rounders Reference?

 

In his entry for Rounders, W. C. Hazlitt speculates: “It is possible that this is the game which, under the name of rownes (rounds) is mentioned in The English Courtier and the Countrey Gentleman: A Pleasant and Learned Disputation, 1586 [printed by Richard Jones, London].  One source attributes this work of Nicholas Breton.  Protoball has not located this book.

 

Hazlitt, W. C., Faiths and Folklore: A Dictionary of National Beliefs, Superstitions, and Popular Customs (Reeves and Turner, London, 1905), vol. 2, page 527.  Note:  Can we find this early text and evaluate whether rounders is in fact its subject?  Caveat:  It would startle most of us to encounter any species of rounders this early; the earliest appearance of the term may be as late as 1828 – see #1828.1 below.

 

1591.1 -- Early Spanish-English Dictionary Mentions the “Trapsticke”

 

Pericule [Percival], Richard, Bibliotheca hispanica: containing a graamar, with a dictionarie in Spanish, English, and Latine, gathered out of diuers good authors: very profitable for the studious of the Spanish toong [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 166.  The dictionary’s entries include “paleta -- a trapsticke” and paletilla -- a little trapsticke.”

1592c.1 – Moralist Lists Things for Scholars to Avoid, Including Playing “Stoole Ball Among Wenches”

“Time of recreation is necessary, I graunt, and think as necessary for schollers . . . as it is for any.  Yet in my opinion it were not fit for them to play at Stoole-ball among wenches, nor at Mumchance or Maw with idle loose companions; not at trunks in Guile-halls, nor to dance about Maypoles, nor to rufle in alehouses, nor to carowse in tauernes, nor to steale deere, nor to rob orchards.  Though who can deny that they may doe these things, yea worse.”

Attributed to Dr. Rainoldes in J. P. Collier, ed., The Political Decameron, or Ten Conversations on English Poets and Poetry [Constable and Co., Edinburgh, 1820], page 257.  This passage is from the “ninth conversation” and covers low practices during the reigns of Elizabeth and of James I.  Note: we need to ascertain the source, date, and context of the original Rainoldes material.  It appears that Rainoldes’ cited “conversation” with Gager took place in 1592.

1592.2 -- Canterbury Stoolballer Bloodies Pious Critic

“We present one Bottolph Wappoll, a continual gamester and one of the very lewd behaviour, who being on Mayday last at stoolball in time of Divine service one of our sidesmen came and admonished him to leave off playing and go to church, for which he fell on him and beat him that the blood ran about his ears.”

Source:  National Stoolball Association, “A Brief History of Stoolball,” [author and date unspecified], page 2.  The original source is not supplied but is reported to have been a presentation from the parish of St Paul in Canterbury to the Archdeacon of Canterbury.  Note: can we find this source?

1598.1 – Youth Ball Games Widespread at London Schools.

 

“After dinner all the youthes go into the fields to play at the bal…. The schollers of euery schoole haue their ball, or baston, in their hands: the auncient and wealthy men of the Citie come foorth on horsebacke to see the sport of young men.”

 

Stow, John, Survey of London [first published in 1598].  David Block [page 166] gives the full title as A Survey of London: Contayning the Originall, Antiquity, Increase, Modern Estate, and Description of that Citie: written in the yeare 1598 [London].  Block adds that the term “baston” is described by the OED as a “cudgel, club, bat or truncheon.”

 

1598.2 -- Italian-English Dictionary Includes Cat, Trap

 

Florio, John, A world of wordes or Most copious, and exact dictionarie in Italian and English [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 167.  This dictionary defines lippa as “a cat or trap as children use to play with.”

 

1598.3-- First Known Appearance of the Term “Cricket”

 

[Cf #1550c.2 above.] A 1598 trial in the Surrey town of Guildford includes a statement by John Derrick, then aged 59.  According to a 1950 history of Guildford’s Royal Grammar School, “[H]e stated that he had known the [disputed] ground for fifty years or more and that ‘when he was a scholar in the free school of Guildford, he and several of his fellows did run and play there at cricket and other plays.’  This is believed to be the first recorded mention of cricket.”

 

Brown, J. F., The Story of the Royal Grammar School, Guildford, 1950, page 6.  Note: it would be interesting to see the original reference, and to know how 1550 was chosen as the reported year of play.

 

1598.4 – Italian Dictionary’s “Cricket-a-wicket” doubted as reference to the Game of Cricket

 

“People have often regarded Florio’s expression in his Italian Dictionary (1598) cricket-a-wicket as the first mention [cf #158.2 and #1598.3, above] of the noble game.  It were strange indeed if this great word first dropped from the pen of an Italian!  I have no doubt myself that this is a mere coincidence of sound. . . .  [C]ricket-a-wicket must pair off with ‘helter-skelter,’ higgledy-piggledy, and Tarabara to which Florio gives gives cricket-a-wicket as an equivalent.”

 

A.G. Steel and R. H. Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 6.  Note: do later writers agree that this was mere coincidence?

 

1600c.1 -- Austrian Physician Reports on Batting/Running Game in Prague; One of Two Accounts Cites Plugging, Bases

 

[A] Guarinoni, Hippolytis, Greuel der Verwustung der menschlichen Gesschlechts [The horrors of the devastation of the human race], [Ingolstadt, Austrian Empire], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 167.  Guarinoni describes a game he saw in Prague in 1600 involving a large field of play, the hitting of a small thrown ball [“the size of a quince”] with a four-foot tapered club, the changing of sides if a hit ball was caught, and, while not mentioning the presence of bases, advises that the game “is good for tender youth which never has enough of running back and forth.”

 

[B] “German Schlagball [“hit the ball”] is also similar to rounders.  The native claim that these games ‘have remained the games of the Germanic peoples, and have won no popularity beyond their countries’ quite obviously does not accord with facts.  It is enough to quote the conclusion of a description of “hit the ball” by H. Guarnoni, who had a medical practice in Innsbruck about 1600:  ‘We enjoyed this game in Prague very much and played it a lot.  The cleverest at it were the Poles and the Silesians, so the game obviously comes from there.’  Incidentally, he was one of the first who described the way in which the game was played.  It was played with a leather ball and a club four-foot long.  The ball was tossed by a bowler who threw it to the striker, who struck it with a club rounded at the end as far into the field as possible, and attempted to make a circuit of the bases without being hit by the ball.  If ‘one of the opposing players catches the ball in the air, a change of positions follows.’”

 

Source: from page 111 of an unidentified photocopy in the “Origins of Baseball” file at the Giamatti Center of the Baseball Hall of Fame.  The quoted material is found in a section termed “Rounders and Other Ball Games with Sticks and Bats,” pp. 110-111.  This section also reports:  “Gyula Hajdu sees the origin of round games as follows: ‘Round games conserve the memory of ancient castle warfare.  A member of the besieged garrison sets out for help, slipping through the camp of the enemy. . . . ‘”  “In Hungary several variants of rounders exist in the countryside.”  Note:  Can we verify the Gyula Hajdu source?  Is it Magyar Nepraiz V. Folklor

 

1600c.2 -- Shakespeare Mentions Rounders?  Pretty Doubtful

 

“Shakespeare mentions games of “base” and “rounders.  Lovett, Old Boston Boys, page 126.”

 

Seymour, Harold – Notes in the Seymour Collection at Cornell University, Kroch Library Department of Rare and Manuscript Collections, collection 4809.  Caveat: We have not yet confirmed that Lovett or Shakespeare used the term “rounders.”  Gomme [page 80], among others, identifies the Bard’s use of “base” in Cymbeline as a reference to prisoner’s base, which is not a ball game.  John Bowman, email of 5/21/2008, reports that his concordance of all of Shakespeare’s words shows has no listing for “rounders” . . . nor for “stoolball,” for that matter [see #1612c.1, below], ‘tho that may because Shakespeare’s authorship of Two Noble Kinsmen is not universally accepted by scholars..

 

1609.1 – Polish Origins of Baseball Perceived in Jamestown VA Settlement

 

“Soon after the new year [1609], [we] initiated a ball game played with a bat . . . . Most often we played this game on Sundays.  We rolled up rags to make balls . . . Our game attracted the savages who sat around the field, delighted with this Polish sport.” 

 

The source is Zbigniew Stefanski, Memorial Commercatoris [A Merchant’s Memoirs], (Amsterdam, 1625), as cited in Block’s Baseball Before We Knew It, page 101.   Stefanski was a skilled Polish workingman who wrote a memoir of his time in the Jamestown colony:  an entry for 1609 related the Polish game of pilka palantowa (bat ball).  Another account by a scholar reported adds that “the playfield consisted of eight bases not four, as in our present day game of baseball.”  If true, this would imply that the game involved running as well as batting.

 

“For your information and records, I am pleased to inform you that after much research I have discovered that baseball was introduced to America by the Poles who arrived in Jamestown in 1609. . . .  Records of the University of Krakow, the oldest school of higher learning in Poland show that baseball or batball was played by the students in the 14th century and was part of the official physical culture program.”

 

Letter from Matthew Baranski to the Baseball Hall of Fame, March 23, 1975.  [Found in the Origins file at the Giamatti Center.]  Matthew Baranski himself cites First Poles in America 1608-1958, published by the Polish Falcons of America, Pittsburgh and unavailable online as of 7/28/09.  We have not confirmed that sighting.  Note:  Per Maigaard’s 1941 survey of “battingball games” includes a Polish variant of long ball, but does not mention pilka palantowa.  Query: The next Protoball reader finding himself/herself in Krakow might drop by the University and find out more?  And could a Polish speaker try some online searches for pilka palantowa and its history?

 

 

1610.1 – Very Early Cricket Match

 

A match is thought to have been played between the men of North Downs and men of the Weald.

 

Contributed by Beth Hise January 12, 2010.  Beth is in pursuit of the original source of this claim.   North Downs is in Surrey, about 4 miles NE of Guildford, where early uses of both “cricket” and “base-ball” are found.  It is about 30 miles SW of London.  The Weald is apparently an old term for the county of Kent, which is SW of London.

 

 

1611.1 -- French-English Dictionary Cites “Cat and Trap” and Cricket

 

Dictionary-maker R. Cotgrave translates “crosse” as “the crooked staff wherewith boies play at cricket.”

 

Martinet” [a device for propelling large stones at castles] is defined as “the game called cat and trap.”

 

Cotgrave, Randle, A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues [London, 1611], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 168. 

 

Cricket historians Steel and Lyttelton:  “Thanks to Cotgrave, then, we know that in 1611 cricket was a boy’s game, played with a crooked bat.  The club, bat, or staff continued to be crooked or curved at the blade till the middle of the eighteenth century or later: and till nearly 1720 cricket was mainly a game for boys.”  A.G. Steel and R. H. Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 6. 

 

 

1612c.1 -- Play Attributed to Shakespeare Cites Stool-ball

A young maid asks her wooer to go with her.  “What shall we do there, wench?”  She replies, “Why, play at stool-ball; what else is there to do?” 

Fletcher and Shakespeare, The Two Noble Kinsmen [London], Act V, Scene 2, per W. W. Grantham, Stoolball Illustrated and How to Play It [W. Speaight, London, 1904], page 29.  David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 170, gives 1634 as the publication date of this play, which was reportedly performed in 1612, and mentions that doubts have been expressed as to authorship, so Shakespeare [1564-1616] may not have contributed.  Others surmise that The Bard wrote Acts One and Five, which would make him the author of the stoolball reference.  See also item #1600c.2 above.  Note: can we find further specifics?  Russell-Goggs, in “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 320, notes that the speaker is the “daughter of the Jailer.”

 

1613.1 -- His and Her Stool-ball Banter: Play or Foreplay?

 

“Ward: Can you play at shuttlecock forsooth?

Isabella: Ay, and stool-ball too, sir; I have great luck at it.

Ward: Why, can you catch a ball well?

Isabella: I have catched two in my lap at one game

Ward:  What, have you, woman?  I must have you learn to play at trap too, then y’are full and whole.”

 

Dutton, Richard Thomas, Women Beware Women and Other Plays [Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999], page 135.  The play itself is generally dated 1613 or 1614.  Submitted by John Thorn, 7/9/2004

 

1614.1 -- Poet Yearns to “Goe to Stoole-Ball-Play”

 

Breton, Nicholas, I Would, and Would Not [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 168.  Stanza 79 reads “I would I were an honest Countrey Wench/ . . . / And for a Tanzey, goe to Stoole-Ball-Play.”  Tansy cakes were reportedly given as prizes for ball play.

 

1615.1 – Stoole Ball Goes North with Early Explorer

 

“And some dayes heare we stayed we shott at butts and bowe and arrows, at other tymes at stoole ball, and some tymes of foote ball

 

William Baffin, from “The Fourth Recorded Voyage of Baffin,” in C. M. Markham, ed., The Voyages of William Baffin, 1612-1622, [Hakluyt Society, 1881], page 122.  This voyage started in March 1615, and the entry is dated June?? 19th, 1615.  The voyage was taken in hope of finding a northwest passage to the East, but was thwarted by ice, and Baffin returned to England in the fall of 1615.  Note: Ascertain the month, which is obscured in the online copy.  Was location of play near what is now known as Baffin Island?

 

 

1616c.1 -- Translation of Homer Depicts Virgins Playing Stool-Ball, Disturbing Ulysses’ Snooze

 

Translator Chapman described a scene in which several virgins play stool-ball near a river while Ulysses sleeps nearby:  “The Queene now (for the upstroke) strooke the ball/Quite wide off th’ other maids; and made it fall/Amidst the whirlpools. 

 

Chapman, George, The whole works of Homer: prince of poets, in his Iliads, and Odysses [London, 1616], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 168.

 

Steel and Lyttelton indicate that Chapman’s translation may date “as early as 1614,” and say report that Chapman calls the fragment “a stoolball chance.” See A.G. Steel and R. H. Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 2.  Note:  The year of the translation needs to be confirmed;.  It would be interesting to see how other translators have treated this scene.

 

1617.1 -- King James’ Controversial “Book of Sports” Omits Mention of Ballplaying

 

Reacting to Puritans’ denunciations of Sabbath recreations, James I in 1617 listed a large number of permitted Sunday activities –including no ball games – and cited as unlawful only “beare and Bull beatinge enterludes & bowlinge. . . .”  Axon, Ernest, Notes of Proceedings. Volume 1 – 1616-1622-3 (Printed for the Record Society for the Publication of Original Documents, 1901), page xxvi.  There was adverse reaction to this proclamation, which is said to have surprised the King.

 

Another source lists the Sunday bans as “Bull-baiting, bear-baiting, interludes, and bowls:”  Keightley, Thomas, The History of England, volume II (Whittaker and Co., London, 1839), page 321.  One chruchman listed “bear-baiting, bull-baiting, common plays, and bowling:” Marsden, J. B., History of Christian Churches and Sects (Richard Bentley, London, 1856), page 269.  Thus, unless “enterludes” then connoted a range of games or “common plays” that included ballplay, contemporary ballgames like stoolball and cricket -- and cat games -- remained unconstrained.

 

 

1619.1 -- Bawdy Poem Has Wenches Playing “With Stoole and Ball”

 

“It was the day of all dayes in the yeare/That unto Bacchus hath its dedication,/ . . . / When country wenches play with stoole and ball,/And run at Barley-breake until they fall:/And country lads fall on them, in such sort/That after forty weekes the[sic] rew the sport.”

 

Anonymous, Pasquils Palinodia, and His Progress to the Taverne; Where, After the Survey of the Sellar, You Are Presented with a Pleasant Pynte of Poeticall Sherry [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 169, who credits Henderson, page 74.  Block notes that “Barley-Break” [not a ball game] was, like stoole ball, traditionally a spring courtship ritual in the English countryside.

 

1621.1 – Some Pilgrims “Openly” Play “Stoole Ball” on Christmas Morning in Massachusetts, So Bradford Clamps Down

 

Governor Bradford describes Christmas Day 1621 at Plymouth Plantation, MA, “most of this new-company excused them selves and said it wente against their consciences to work on ye day.  So ye Govr tould them that if they made it mater of conscience, he would spare them till they were better informed.  So he led away ye rest and left them; but when they came home at noone from their worke, he found them in ye street at play, openly; some at pitching ye barr, and some at stoole-ball and shuch like sport. . . . Since which time nothing hath been attempted that way, at least openly.”

 

Bradford, William, Of Plymouth Plantation, [Harvey Wish, ed., Capricorn Books, 1962], pp 82 – 83.  Henderson cites Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, 1856. See his ref 23.  Full text supplied by John Thorn, 6/25/2005.  Bradford explained that the issue was not that ball-playing was sinful, but that playing openly while others worked was not good for morale.

 

1622.1 – Bad, Bad Batts!

 

A Chichester churchwarden indicted a group of men for ballplaying, reasoning thus: “first, for it is contrarie to the 7th Article; second, for they are used to break the Church window with the balls; and thirdly, for that little children had like to have their braynes beaten out with the cricket batt.”

 

Brookes, Christopher, English Cricket: the game and its players through the ages (Newton Abbot, 1978), page 16, as cited in Bateman, Anthony,“’More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 29.

 

1629.1 -- Play Refers to Weakling Who Was “Beat . . . With a Trap Stick”

 

Shirley, James, The Wedding. As it was lately acted by her Mauesties seruants at the Phenix at Drury Lane [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 170.  A servant in the play describes his master as so mild in manner that “the last time he was in the field a boy of seven year old beat him with a trap-stick.”

 

1629.2 – Curate Can’t Beat the Rap as Cricketer

 

“In 1629, having been censured for playing ‘at Cricketts,’ the curate of Ruckinge in Kent unsuccessfully defended himself on the grounds that it was a game played by men of quality.”

 

Bateman, Anthony,“’More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 29.  Bateman does not provide his source for this anecdote.  Note:  Can we find and extend this story?

 

1630c.1 – “Ancient Cheshire Games” Include Stooleball, Nine Holes

 

“Any they dare challenge for to throw the sleudge,/To Jumpe or leape over dich or hedge,/ To wrastle, play at stooleball, or to Runne,/ To pitch the bar, or to shoote off a Gunne/ To play at Loggets, nine holes, or ten pins. . . .[list continues, mentioning stool ball once more at end.]”

 

This verse, titled “Ancient Cheshire Games: Auntient customes in games used by boys and girles merily sett out in verse,” is attributed to “Randle Holmes’s MSS Brit Mus.” Is in Medium of Inter-communications for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, Etc, July – December 1856, page 487.  Note:  Can we learn why is this account associated with 1630?  This entry needs to be reconciled with #1585.1 above.  Add online search detail?

 

1630c.2 – Stoolball Play Makes Maidstone a “Very Profane Town”

 

“About 1630 a Puritan records that ‘Maidstone was formerly a very profane town, where stoolball and other games were practiced on the Lord’s Day.”

 

M. S. Russell-Goggs, “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 318.  Note: we need to locate the full citations for this and all other Russell-Goggs references.. We need to sort out how this claim relates to the very similar wording in the quote by Reverend Wilson in entry #1672.1 below.

 

1630c.3 – City Women’s Shrovetide Customs Include Stooleball

 

“In the early seventeenth century, an Oxford fellow, Thomas Crosfield, noted the customs of Shrovetide as ‘1. frittering.  2. throwing at cocks.  3. playing at stooleball in ye Citty by women & footeball by men.’”  Shrovetide was the Monday and Tuesday [That Tuesday being Mardi Gras in some quarter] preceding Ash Wednesday and the onset of Lent.

 

Griffin, Emma, “Popular Recreation and the Significance of Space,” (publication unknown), page 36.  The original source is shown as the Crosfield Diary for March 1, 1633, page 63.  Thanks to  John Thorn for supplementing a draft of this entry.  One citation for the diary is F. S. Boas, editor, The Diary of Thomas Crosfield (Oxford University Press, London, 1935).

 

 

1631.1 – Drama by Philip Massenger Refers to Cat-Stick

 

“Page: You, sirrah sheep’s-head/ With a face cut on a cat-stick, do you hear?/ You, yeoman fewterer, conduct me to/ the lady of the mansion, or my poniard/ Shall disembogue thy soul.”

 

“The Maid of Honour,” Scene 2, in The Plays of Philip Massinger, Volume 1 (John Murray, London, 1830), page 327. 

 

Notes written in 1830 by W. Gifford:  Cat-stick.  This, I believe, is what is now called a buck-stick, used by children in the game of tip-cat, or kit-cat.”   Query:  Is it clear why an abusive address like this would employ a phrase like “cut on a cat-stick?”  Does it imply, for instance a disfigured or pock-marked visage? 

 

1632.1 -- In Germany, Ballplaying Associated With Scabies, Other Diseases

 

“The [preceding] reference to Fuchsius should be to Institutiones 2.3.4: . . . ‘Whereby the habit of our German schoolboys is most worthy of reprehension, who never take exercise except immediately after food, either jumping or running or playing ball or quoits or taking part in other exercises of a like nature; so that it is no surprise, seeing they thus accumulate a great mass of crude humours, that they suffer from perpetual scabies, and other diseases caused by vicious humours’:p. 337)”

 

Burton, Robert E., The Anatomy of Melancholy, vol. 4 [Clarenden Press, Oxford, 1989], page 285.  [Note: We need to confirm date of the Fuschius quote; we’re not sure why it is assigned to 1632.].  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

1633c.1 – Ambiguous Reference to Stoole Ball Appears in a Drama

 

“At stoole ball I have a North-west stripling shall deale with ever a boy in the Strand.”

 

Cited in W. C. Hazlitt, Faiths and Folklore: A Dictionary of National Beliefs, Superstitions and Popular Customs [Reeves and Turner, London, 1905], page 569.  Hazlitt attributes this mysterious fragment to someone named Stickwell in Totenham Court, by T. Nabbes, appearing in 1638.  Note: Can we guess what Stickwell was trying to say, and why?  I find that Nabbes wrote this drama in 1633 or before, and surmise that “Stickwell” is the name of the fictional character who speaks the quoted line.  Can we straighten out, or interpret, the syntax of this line? [The Strand, presumably, refers to the London street of that name?]

 

1634.1 – That Archbishop Laud, He Certainly Doesn’t Laud Stoolball

 

“In his visitation and reference to churchyards, he [Archbishop Laud, in 1634] is troubled because ‘several spend their time in stoolball.’”

 

M. S. Russell-Goggs, “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 318.  Note1: we need to locate the full citations for this and all other Russell-Goggs references.

 

Another source quotes Laud as saying “This whole churchyard is made a receptacle for all ydle persons to spend their time in stopball and such lyke recreacions.”  OED, Abp Laud’s Visit, in 4th Rep Hist. MSS Comm. App 144/1, provided by John Thorn, email of 6/11/2007.  Note2: is this from the same source?

 

1637.1 -- Conservative Protestants Decry Sunday Play, See Grave Danger in it

 

Burton, Henry, and William Prynne, A Divine Tragedie Lately Acted [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 171.  In a denunciation of King Charles’ approval of after-church play on Sundays, the authors cite as one of the “memorable examples of Gods judgements” a case in which youths “playing at Catt on the Lords day, two of them fell out, and the one hitting the other under the eare with his catt, he therwith fell downe for dead.”  Cited by David Block in Baseball Before We Knew It, page 171: Block notes that the weapon here was a cat-stick.

 

1637.2 -- Play Mentions Trap

 

Shirley, James, Hide Park: A Comedie [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 171.  A beautiful young woman, to a servant who is fishing for a compliment:  “Indeed, I have heard you are a precious gentleman/ And in your younger days could play at trap well.”

 

1638.1 -- Bishop Sees Churchyard as Consecrated Ground: No Stool Ball, Drinkings, Merriments

 

Bishop Mantague admonishes Norwich Churchmen to consider the churchyard as consecrated ground, “not to be profaned by feeding and dunging cattle . . . .  Much less is it to be unhallowed with dancings, morrises, meetings at Easter, drinkings, Whitson ales, midsummer merriments or the like, stool ball, football, wrestlings, wasters or boy’s sports.”

 

Barrett, Jay Botsford, English Society in the Eighteenth Century as Influence from Oversea [Macmillan, New York, 1924], page 221.  Barrett cites this passage as Articles of Enquiry and Direction for the Diocese of Norwich, sigs. A3-A3v.

 

1638.2 – Archdeacon: Churchyards Are Not For Stoole-ball or “Other Profane Uses”

 

“Have any playes, feasts, banquets, suppers, churchales, drinkings, temporal courts or leets, lay juries, musters, exercise of dauncing, stoole-ball, foot-ball, or the like, or any other profane usage been suffered to be kept in your church, chappell, or churchyard?

 

Attributed to Mr. Dr. Pearson, Archdeacon of Suffolke, in Heino Pfannenschmid, Das Weihwasser [Hahn’sche Hofbuchhandlung, Hannover, 1869], page 74n.

 

1640.1 – Stoolball Attracts Gentry, Rascals, Boys

 

“J. Smythe, in his Hundred of Berkeley (1640) gave the following admonition: ‘Doe witness the inbred delight, that both gentry, yeomanry, rascallity, boyes, and children, doe take in a game called stoball. . .  And not a sonne of mine, but at 7 was furnished with his double stoball staves, and a gamester thereafter.’”

 

M. S. Russell-Goggs, “Stoolball in Sussex,” The Sussex County Magazine, volume 2, no. 7 (July 1928), page 320.  John Smyth’s three-volume Berkeley Manuscripts were published in 1883 by J. Bellows; Volume Three is titled “A description of the hundred of Berkeley in the County of Gloucester . . .  .“  Citation supplied by John Thorn, email of 1/30/2008.

 

 

1648.1 -- Short Herrick Poem Proposes a Wager on Stool-ball Game

 

“At Stool-ball, Lucia, let us play,” offers the poet, then proposing that if he wins, he would “have for all a kisse.”

 

Herrick, Robert, Hesperdes: or, the Works Both Human and Divine of Robert Herrick, Esq. [London], page 280, per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 171. 

 

1652.1 -- Traveler in Wales Reports “Laudable” Sunday Games of “Trap, Cat, Stool-ball, Racket &c”

 

Taylor, John, A Short Relation of a Long Journey Made Round or Ovall [London], book 4, per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 172.  A versifier recounts his journey to Wales, where he notes a lack of religious fervor, “so that people do exercise and edify in the churchyard at the lawful and laudable games of trap, cat, stool-ball, racket, &c., on Sundays.”

 

1653.1 -- Play Refers to Trapsticks

 

A character is asked how he might raise some needed money:  “If my woodes being cut down cannot fill this pocket, cut ‘em into trapsticks.”

 

Middleton, Thomas, and William Rowley, The Spanish Gipsie [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 172.  Block observes that this snippet suggests that “trapstick” was by then commonly understood as a trap-ball bat.

 

1653.2 – Early Use of “Cricket” Seen in Rabelais Translation

 

“So far as is known, the first mention [of the word “cricket”] occurs in Sir Thomas Urquhart’s translation of the works of Rabelais, published in London in 1653, where it is found enumerated as one of the games of the Gargantua.”

 

Editorial, “The Pedigree of Cricket,” The Irish Times, 5/9/1931.  Reprinted in The Times, 5/9/2001.  From the MCC Library collection.

 

Caveat: We now have at least four pre-1653 claims to the use of “cricket” and similar terms: see #1598.3, #1598.4, #1611.1, #1622.1, and #1629.2 above.  Note: Rabelais’ “games of Gargantua” is a list of over 200 games supposedly played at one sitting by the fictional character Gargantua.  Urquhart’s translation includes several familiar pastimes, including cricket, nine-pins, billiards, “tip and hurl” [?], prison bars, barley-break, and the morris dance . . . along with many games that appear to be whimsy and word-play [“ramcod ball,” “nivinivinack,” and “the bush leap”].  Not included are: club ball, stick ball, stoolball, horne billets, nine holes, hat ball, rounders, feeder, or base ball.  Francis Rabelais – Completely Translated into English by Urquhard and Motteux (the Aldus Society, London, 1903), pp 68-71.  Text chased down by John Thorn, email of 1/30/2008.  

 

1656.1 – Dutch Prohibit “Playing Ball,” Cricket on Sundays in New Netherlands.

 

In October 1656 Director-General Peter Stuyvesant announced a stricter Sabbath Law in New Netherlands, including fine of a one pound Flemish for “playing ball,” cricket, tennis, ninepins, dancing, drinking, etc.  Source: 13: Doc Hist., Volume Iv, pp.13-15, and Father Jogues’ papers in NY Hist. Soc. Coll., 1857, pp. 161-229, as cited in Manual of the Reformed Church in America (Formerly Ref. Prot. Dutch Church), 1628-1902, E. T. Corwin, D.D.,  Fourth Edition (Reformed Church in America, New York, 1902.)  Provided by John Thorn, email of 2/1/2008.

 

Note: It would be useful to ascertain what Dutch phrase was translated as “playing ball,” and whether the phrase denotes a certain type of ballplay.  The population of Manhattan at this time was about 800 [were there enough resident Englishmen to sustain cricket?], and the area was largely a fur trading post. Is it possible that the burghers imported this text from the Dutch homeland?

 

1656.2 – Two English Counties Agree: Stoolball Gets “Too Much Attention.”

 

“The game [Stoolball] cropped up in 1656 in a pronouncement by the Counties of Cumberland and Westmoreland which said that “too much attention was being paid to ‘shooting, playing at football, stoolball, wrestling.’”

 

SRA website, accessed 4/11/07.  Note: we need a fuller citation and perhaps further text and motivation for these pronouncements.

 

1656.3 – Cromwellians Needlessly Ban Cricket from Ireland

 

Simon Rae writes that the “killjoy mentality reached its zenith under the Puritans, during the Interregnum, achieving an absurd peak when cricket was banned in Ireland in 1656 even though the Irish didn’t play it.”  Evidently, hurling was mistaken for cricket.

 

Simon Rae, It’s Not Cricket: A History of Skulduggery, Sharp Practice and Downright Cheating in the Noble Game (Faber and Faber, 2001), page 46.  Note: Rae does not document this event.

  

 

1658.1 -- English Parish Rewards Informant for Ratting on Sunday Trap-baller

 

Nichols, John, Illustrations of the Manners and Expences of Ancient Times in England [London, 1797], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 182.  Included is an account from the parish of St. Margaret’s, Westminster, from 1658: “Item to Richard May, 13 shillings for informing of one that played at trap-ball on the Lord’s day.”

 

1658.2 – Milton’s Nephew Eyes Cricket with Apprehension

 

“Cricket was . . . emerging in a written sense, not through the form of a celebratory discourse, but as the target of Puritan and sabbatarian ire.  Even in the first reliable literary reference to cricket – in The Mysteries of Love and Eloquence (1658) [a poem] by John Milton’s nephew, Edward Philips – the game is represented as synonymous with brutality: ‘Ay, but Richard, will you not think so hereafter?  Will you not when you have me throw a stool at my head, and cry, “Would my eyes had been beaten out with a cricket ball [“batt?” asks Bateman], the day before I saw thee”’.”

 

Bateman, Anthony,“More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture,, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 30.  Bateman does not give the original source for the Philips quotation.   Note:  Can we find the original Philips source?  A few citations give the year of publication as 1685.

 

1659.1 -- Stuyvesant: No Tennis, Ball-Playing, Dice on Fast Day

 

“We shall interdict and forbid, during divine service on the [fasting] day aforesaid, all exercise and games of tennis, ball-playing, hunting, plowing and sowing, and moreover all unlawful practice such as dice, drunkenness . . .”  proclaimed Peter Stuyvesant.  Stuyvesant was Director-General of New Netherlands.

 

Manchester, Herbert, Four Centuries of Sport in America (Publisher?, 1931).  Email from John Thorn, 1/24/097.  Query: Can we determine what area was affected by this proclamation?  How does this proclamation relate to #1656.1 above?

 

1660c.1 – Village Life: The Men to Foot-Ball, Maids and Kids to Stoolball

 

The biography of a 17th century lord includes “a nostalgic description of the little town of Kirtling” by the lord’s son Roger, born in 1651, as follows:

 

“The town was then my grandfather’s . . . it was always the custom for the youth of the town . . . to play [from noon when chores ended] to milking time and supper at night.  The men [went to play] football, and the maids, with whom we children were commonly mixed, being not proof for the turbulence of the other party, to stoolball and such running games as they knew.”  Dale B. J. Randall, Gentle Flame: The Life and Verse of Dudley, Lord North (1602 – 1677 (Duke Univ. Press, 1983), page 56.  The town of Kirtling is in Cambridgeshire, northeast of London.

 

 

1660c.2 -- Ben Franklin’s Uncle Recalls Ballplaying On an English Barn

 

“That is the street which I could ne’er abide,/And these the grounds I play’d side and hide;/ This the pond whereon I caught a fall,/ And that the barn whereon I play’d at ball.”

 

The uncle of U.S. patriot Benjamin Franklin, also named Benjamin Franklin, wrote these lines in a 1704 recollection of his native English town of Ecton.  The uncle lived from 1650/1 to 1727.  Ecton is a village in Northamptonshire.

 

Loring, J. S., The Franklin ManuscriptsThe Historical Magazine, and Notes and Queries Concerning the Antiquities, History, and Biography of America (1857-1875), Volume 3, issue 1, January 1859, 4 pages. Submitted by John Thorn, 4/24/06. 

 

 

1661.1 – Galileo Galilei Discovers . . . Backspin!

 

The great scientist wrote, in a treatise discussing how the ball behaves in different ball games, including tennis:  “Stool-ball, when they play in a stony way, . . . they do not trundle the ball upon the ground, but throw it, as if to pitch a quait. . . . .  To make the ball stay, they hold it artificially with their hand uppermost, and it undermost, which in its delivery hath a contrary twirl or rolling conferred upon it by the fingers, by means whereof in its coming to the ground neer the mark it stays there, or runs very little forwards.”  Galileo Galilei, Mathmatical Collections and Translations.  “Inglished from his original Italian copy by Thomas Salusbury” (London, 1661), page 142.

 

Provided by David Block, email of 2/27/2008.  David further asks: “could it be that this is the source of the term putting “English” on a ball?”

 

1665.1 -- Poet Depicts Fleet-footed Mercury as Wielding a Kit-Cat Bat

 

This translation of a French parody of Virgil’s Aeneid includes these lines on the god Mercury:  “Then in his hand he take a thick Bat,/ With which he us’d to play at kit-cat;/ To beat mens Apples from their trees, . . . ”  Ouch.

 

Scarron, Paul, Scarronnides, or, Virgile travestie a mock poem [London], trans. Charles Cotton, Book Four, per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 172. 

 

1666.1 -- John Bunyan is Very Seriously Interrupted at Tip-Cat, a “Chief Sin”

 

“I was in the midst of a game of cat, and having struck it one blow from the hole, just as I was about to strike the second time a voice did suddenly dart from Heaven into my soul which said, ‘Wilt thou leave thy sins and go to Heaven or have thy sins and go to hell?’” 

 

Bunyan, John, Grace abounding to the chief of sinners [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 173.  Autobiographical account by Bunyan, the author of The Pilgrim’s Progress.  David notes on 5/29/2005 that this reference was originally reported by Harold Peterson, but that Peterson had attributed it to Pilgrim’s Progress itself.

 

Writing of Bunyan in 1885, Washington Gladden revealed that as a youth, “[t]he four chief sins of which he was guilty were dancing, ringing the bells of the parish church, playing at tip-cat, and reading the history of Sir Bevis of Southampton.”  Letter to the Editor, The Century Magazine, Volume 30 [May-October 1885), page 334.  Q

 

1669.1 – Shadwell Play Said to List Rural Games, including Stool-ball.

 

“The writer who took most interest in popular pastimes was Shadwell, whose rococo play The Royal Shepherdess was produced before the king in 1669.  It included country folk who danced and sand of a list of genuine English rural games, such as trap, keels, barley-break, golf [and] stool-ball . . . .”

 

Hutton, Ronald, The Rise and Fall of Merry England: the Ritual Year, 1400-1700 (Oxford U Press, Oxford, 1994), page 235.  Provided by John Thorn, email, 7/9/2004.  Note: can we retrieve the full original list?

 

1671.1 -- Lusty Little Song Mentions Trap as “Innocent” Prelude to Heavy Petting

 

“Thus all our life long we are frolick and gay,/And instead of Court revels, we merrily play/At Trap, at Rules, and at Barly-break run:/At Goff, and at Foot-ball, and when we have done/These innocent sports, we’l laugh and lie down,/And to each pretty Lass/We will give a green Gown.

 

Ebsworth, Joseph W., Westminster Drolleries, Both Parts, of 1671, 1672 [R. Roberts, Lincolnshire, 1875], page 28.  Note: Yes, the player’s method for turning the gown to green is what you suspect it is.  We’ll see this gown again at #1719.1, below.

 

1672.1 – Rev. Wilson Decries Sunday “Stool-Ball” and “Cricketts” Playing

 

 

In his memoirs, the Rev. Thomas Wilson, a Puritan divine of Maidstone, England, states: “Maidstone was formerly a very profane town, in as much as I have seen morrice-dancing, cudgel-playing, stool-ball, cricketts, and many other sports openly and publicly indulged in on the Lord’s Day.” 

 

Note:  Henderson covers Wilson, but doesn’t reference him.  In the text, he says that Wilson wrote a memoir in 1700, but doesn’t use a year for the events that were then recalled.  I assume that the 1672 date is taken from date clues in the whole text.  Henderson's source may be his ref #167: see Woodruff, C.H., “Origin of Cricket,” Baily’s Magazine [London, 1901], Vol. 6, p. 51. David Block [page 173ff] describes how “base ball” was substituted for “stool-ball” in later accounts of Wilson’ s biography, which he cites as Swinnick, George, The Life and Death of Mr. Tho. Wilson, Minister of Maidstone [London].

 

1672c.2 -- Francis Willughby’s “Book of Games” Surveys Folkways:  First Stoolball Rules Appear

 

Warwickshire scientist Francis Willughby [1635-1672] compiled, in manuscript form, descriptions of over 130 games, including, stoolball, hornebillets, kit-cat, stowball, and tutball [but not cricket, trapball or rounders].  He died at 36 and the incomplete manuscript, long held privately, became known to researchers in the 1990s and was published in 2003.

 

Willughby described stoolball as a game in which a team of players defended an overturned stool with their hands.  Hornebillets, unlike stoolball, involved batting and running [between holes placed 7 or 8 yards apart], but it used no ball – a cat was used as the batted object.  A runner [running was compulsory, even for short hits] had to place his staff in a hole before the other team could put the cat in that hole.  The number of holes depended on the number of players available.  Stowball appears as a golf-like game.  Kit Cat is described as a sort of fungo game in which the cats can be hit 60 yards or more.  He does not mention cricket, trap, or other games.

 

David Cram, Jeffrey L. Forgeng, and Dorothy Johnston, Francis Willughby’s Book of Games: A Seventeenth Century Treatise on Sports, Games, and Pastimes [Ashgate Publishing, 2003]. 

 

1676.1 -- The “Citty of New Yorke” Sets a Fine for Sunday “Gameing or Playing: Ten Guilders

 

The Mayor and Aldermen of New York that none should “att any Time hereafter willfully or obstinately prophane the Sabbath daye by .  . . Playinge att Cards Dice Tables or any other Vnlawful Games whatsoeuer,” banning “alsoe the disorderly Assemblyes of Children In ye Streets and other Places To the disturbance of Others with Noyse.”  Consequences?  “Ye Person or Persons soe found drinkinge Gameing or Playing Either in Priuate or Publicke Shall forfeict Tenn Guildrs for Euery such offence.”  Note that ballplaying was not specifically prohibited.  Dated November 13, 1676.  Laws of the City of New York [Publication data?], page 27.  Submitted by John Thorn 9/29/06.

 

 

1676.2 – Early Limeys Take “Krickett” to Far Mediterranean Coast

 

The chaplain assigned to three British ships at Aleppo [now in northern Syria] wrote this in his diary for May 6, 1676:

 

As was the custom all summer long, this day [in May 1676] “at least 40 of the English, with his worship the Consull, rod [sic] out of the citty about 4 miles to the Greene Platt, a fine vally by a river side, to recreate them selves.  Where a princely tent was pitched; and wee had severall pastimes and sports, as duck-hunting, fishing, shooting, handball, krickett, scrofilo . . . .  and at 6 wee returne all home in good order, but soundly tyred and weary.”

 

A.G. Steel and R. H. Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 8.  The passage is at Teonge, Henry, The Diary of Henry Teonge (Charles Knight, London, 1825), page 159.  Accessed on Google Books, 12/28/2007.

 

 

1677.1 -- Almanac’s Easter Verse Mentions Stool-ball

 

“Young men and maids,/ Now very brisk,/ At barley-break and/ Stool-ball frisk.”

 

W. Winstanley, Poor Robin 1677.  An almanack after a new fashion, by Poor Robin [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 174.

 

1680.1 -- Political Tract Uses Trap-stick Metaphor

 

Anon., Honest Hodge and Ralph Holding a Sober Discourse in Answer to a late Scandalous and Pernicious Pamphlet, by “a person of quality” [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 174.  The anonymous author of this tract sees the pamphlet as a tool used to trigger civil unrest in England, calling it “a mere trap-stick to bang the Phanaticks about.”

 

1680s.2 -- Cricket Pitch Thought to be Established at 22 Yards

 

While the length of the cricket pitch [distance between wickets] was formally set at 22 yards in the 1744 rules, that distance is already “thought to have been 22 yards in the 1680’s.”  [John Thorn points out that 22 yards is one-tenth of a furlong (and is also one-eightieth of a mile), and that a 22-yard chain was commonly used as a standard starting in the 1600’s; in fact, the “chain” became itself a word for this distance in 1661; email of 2/1/2008.]

 

Scholefield, Peter, Cricket Laws and Terms [Axiom Publishing, Kent Town Australia, 1990], page 16. Note: Scholefield does not provide a citation for this claim; keep an eye out!

 

1683c.1 – Cricket’s First Wicket is Pitched

 

“We know that the first wicket, comprising two stumps with a bail across them, was pitched somewhere about 1683, as John Nyren recalled long afterward.”  Thomas Moult, “The Story of the Game,” in Thomas Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (The Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960: reprint from 1935), page 31.

 

Note:  We should locate Nyren’s original claim.  Does this imply that cricket was played without wickets, or without bails, before 1683?

 

1685.1 -- Juicy Early Description of Stool-ball is Written, Then Unread for 162 Years

 

Aubrey, John, Natural History of Wiltshire [London, Nichols and Son, 1847], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 210.  Folklorist Alice Gomme [see below] called this the earliest description of stool-ball.  Aubrey says “it is peculiar to North Wilts, North Gloucestershire, and a little part of Somerset near Bath.  They smite a ball, stuffed very hard with quills and covered with soale leather, with a staffe, commonly made of withy, about three feet and a half long.  Colerne down is the place so famous and so frequented for stobbal playing.  The turfe is very fine and the rock (freestone) is within an inch and a halfe of the surface which gives the ball so quick a rebound.  A stobball ball is of about four inches diameter and as hard as stone.  I do not heare that this game is used anywhere in England but in this part of Wiltshire and Gloucestershire adjoining.”  From A. B. Gomme, The Traditional Games of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 1964 reprint of 1898 text [New York, Dover], page 217.

 

1688.1 – New Royals Reportedly Watch Stoolball

 

“It is reported that William III watched the game soon after he landed at Torbay, and that subsequently Queen Anne was an interested spectator.”

 

M. S. Russell-Goggs, page 320.  Note: we need to locate the full citations for this and all other Russell-Goggs references; short of this, we need to confirm the date of the Torbay landing.  A cursory Google search does not reveal confirming evidence of this anecdote.

 

1690.1 -- Literary Simile: “Catch it Like a Stool-Ball”

 

Anon., The Pagan Prince: or a Comical History of the Heroik Atchievements of the Palatine of Eboracum [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 175.  In this comical prose work, protection in battle was said to be provided by four Arch Angels -- who, “when they see a Cannon Ball coming toward ye from any corner of the Wind, will catch it like a stool-ball and throw it to the Devil.”

 

1694.1 --Musical Play Includes Baudy Account of Stoolball

 

D’Urfey, Thomas, The comical history of Don Quixote [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 175.  Block sees a “long, silly, bawdy rap song” in this play.  It starts “Come all, great, small, short tall, away to Stoolball,” and depicts young men and women becoming pretty familiar. It ends “Then went the Glasses round, then went the lasses down, each Lad did his Sweet-heart own, and on the Grass did fling her.  Come all, great small, short tall, a-way to Stool Ball.”  Sounds like fun.

 

1694.2 – Thaw Arrives; Cricket Added to Old List of “Evening” English Pastimes

 

“With a relaxation of attitudes towards sports at the Restoration cricket began to emerge from its position of relative obscurity with the printed word beginning to define it, along with other folk games, as an element of the national culture.  Edward Chamberlyne’s Anglia Notitia, a handbook on the social and political conditions of England, lists cricket for the first time in the eighteenth edition of 1694.  ‘The natives will endure long and hard labour; insomuch, that after 12 hours of hard work, they will go in the evening to foot-ball, stool-ball, cricket, prison-base, wrestling, cudgel-playing, and some such vehement exercise, for their recreation.’”

 

Source: Bateman, Anthony, “More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 30. 

 

Upon further examination, Protoball notes that Anglia Notitia actually has two ongoing areas of special interest.  The first is the text above in part 1, chapter V, which had evolved through earlier editions – the 1676 edition – if not earlier ones -- had already mentioned stow-ball [changed to “stoolball” as of 1694 or earlier], according to Hazlitt’s Faith and Folklore.  Cricket historian Diana Rait Kerr agrees that cricket was first added in the 18th edition of 1694.

 

Another section of Anglia Notitia catalogued English recreations.  Text for this section – part 3, chapter VII -- is accessible online for the 1702, 1704, 1707, and later editions. These recreations were listed in three parts: for royalty, for nobles and gentry, and for “Citizens and Peasants.”  Royal sports included tennis, pell mell and billiards. The gentry’s sports included tennis, bowling, and billiards.  And then: “The Citizens and Peafants have Hand-ball, Stow-ball, Nine-Pins, Shovel-board [and] Goffe,” said the 20th edition [1702].  In the 22nd edition [1707], cricket had been inserted as something that commoners also played. We find no reference to club ball, stick ball, trap ball, or other games suggested as precursors of baseball. The full title of Chamberlayne is Anglia Notitia, or the Present State of England: With Divers Remarks on the Ancient State Thereof.  Chamberlayne’s first edition apparently appeared in 1669; the 37th was issued in 1748. Another Chamberlayne excerpt is found at entry #1704.2 below.

 

John Thorn supplied crucial input for this entry.  Note:  It would be interesting to see whether earlier and later editions of Chamberlayne cite other games of interest.

 

1697.1 – “A Great Match at Cricket” for a Tidy Purse

 

The Foreign Post, July 7, 1697 reports that in Sussex, two sides of eleven each, eyeing a prize of 50 guineas, played “a great match at cricket.”

 

Contributed by Beth Hise, January 12, 2010.

 

1700.1 – First Public Notice of a Cricket Match?

 

“Of course, there are many bare announcements of matches played before that time [the 1740’s].  In 1700 The Postboy advertised one to take place on Clapham Common.”

 

Thomas Moult, “The Story of the Game,” in  Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (The Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960; reprinted from 1935), page 27.  Moult does not further identify this publication.

 

Note: A Wikipedia entry accessed on 10/17/08 states:A series of matches, to be held on Clapham Common [in South London -- LMc] , was pre-announced on 30 March by a periodical called The Post Boy. The first was to take place on Easter Monday and prizes of £10 and £20 were at stake. No match reports could be found so the results and scores remain unknown. Interestingly, the advert says the teams would consist of ten Gentlemen per side but the invitation to attend was to Gentlemen and others. This clearly implies that cricket had achieved both the patronage that underwrote it through the 18th century and the spectators who demonstrated its lasting popular appeal.”  Caveat: This entry is has incomplete citations and cannot be verified.

 

1700c.2 – Wicket Seen on Boston Common . . . But Never on Sunday

 

“Close of the 17th century: . . . The Common was always a playground for boys – wicket and flinging of the bullit was much enjoyed . . . .  No games were allowed to be played on the Sabbath, and a fine of five shillings was imposed on the owner of any horse seen on the Common on that day.  People were not even to stroll on the Common, during the warm weather, on Sunday.”

 

Samuel Barber, Boston Common: A Diary of Notable Events, Incidents and Neighboring Occurrences (Christopher Publishing, Boston, 1916 – Second Edition), page 47.  Note: This book is in the form of a chronology.  Barber gives no source for the wicket report.

 

1704.1 – Traveler Observes Ball-Playing in CT

 

Madame Knight, “in her inimitable journal of her ride from Boston to New York in 1704, speaks of ball-playing in Connecticut.”

 

“The Game of Wicket and Some Old-Time Wicket Players,” in George Dudley Seymour, Papers and Addresses of the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, Volume II of the Proceedings of the Society, [n. p., 1909.] page 284.  Submitted by John Thorn, 7/11/04.  John notes 9/3/2005 that Seymour observes that Madame Knight does not specifically name the sport as wicket, but he excludes cricket as a possibility because cricket was not then known to have been played in America before 1725; however, John adds, we now have a cricket reference in Virginia from 1709.  [See #1709.1, below.]

 

1704.2 -- While the Rurals Had Stool-ball and Cricket, the Londoner Had “Blood-Stirring Excitement”

 

“[T]he growth of a commercial London failed to raise the tone of sporting tastes.  While the countryman exercised vehemently at football, stool-ball, cricket, pins-on-base, wrestling, or cudgel-playing, there was fiercer and more blood-stirring excitement for the Londoner.  Particularly at Hockley-in-the-Hole, one could find bear-baiting, bull-baiting and cock-fighting to his heart’s content.”

 

Chamberlayne, Edward, Anglia Notitia: The  Present State of England [London, 1704 and 1748], page 51.  Submitted by John Thorn, 7/9/04.

 

1704.4 -- Earliest Published Rules of Cricket [?]

 

“[The following] text is, as far as we know, the earliest published rules of cricket that have come down to us.  They are more than eighty years older than the first official Laws of Cricket, published in 1789.”  The ensuing text calls for the 4-ball over, unregulated runner and fielder interference, and has no rule to keep a batsman from deflecting bowled balls with his body.

 

http://www.seatllecricket.com/history/1704laws.htm, accessed 10/2/02.  The site offers no source.  Most sources date the easiest rules to 1744; could this date stem from a typo?  No source is given for the rules themselves. Beth Hise, on January 12, 2010, expressed renewed skepticism about the 1704 date.  Caution: we have requested confirmation and sources from this website, and have not had a reply as of Feb. 2010.

 

1705.1 – Early Cricket Match “To Be Plaid . . . for 11 Guineas a Man”

 

An account in the July 24 issue of The Postman reads, “This is to give notice that a match of cricket is to be plaid between 11 gentlemen of the west part of Kent, against as many of Chatham, for 11 guineas a man at Maulden in Kent on August 7th next.”  Thomas Moult, “The Story of the Game,” in Thomas Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960; reprint of 1935), page 27. 

 

1706.1 -- Poem Suggests Cricket is Becoming “Respectable”

 

Goldwin, William, In Certamen Pilae.  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 15.  Ford does not provide a full citation for this source.  He reports the poem, written Latin, as “describing the early game and suggesting, perhaps, that it is becoming ‘respectable.’  He adds that “there was academic controversy over its translation in 1923.”  John Thorn offers that the poem was published in Goldwin’s Musae Juveniles in 1706, and was translated by Harold Perry as “The Cricket Match” in 1922 [email of 2/1/2008].  John also sent Protoball the original text, for you Latin speakers out there.

 

 

1706.2 -- Book About a Scotsman Mentions “Cat and Doug” and Other Diversions

 

[Author?] The Scotch rogue; or, The life and actions of Donald MacDonald, a Highland Scot [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 176.  The [apparently fictional] hero recalls; “I was but a sorry proficient in learning: being readier at cat and doug, cappy-hole, riding the burley hacket, playing at kyles and dams, spangboder, wrestling, and foot-ball (and such other sports as we use in our country) than at my book.”  Block identifies “cat and doug,” or cat and dog, as a Scots two-base version of the game of cat, “and the likely forbear of the American game of two-old-cat.”

 

1709.1 – A Form of [Two-man and Four-man] Cricket Played in Virginia

 

In an April 25, 1709 diary entry, William Byrd, owner of the Virginia plantation Westover, wrote:  “I rose at 6 o’clock and said my prayers shortly.  Mr. W-l-s and I fenced and I beat him.  Then we played at cricket, Mr. W-l-s and John Custis against me and Mr. {Hawkins], but we were beaten.  I ate nothing but milk for breakfast . . .”

 

On May 6 of the same year he noted: “I rose about 6 o'clock and Colonel Ludwell, Nat Harrison, Mr. Edwards and myself played at cricket, and I won a bit [presumably an eighth of a Spanish dollar].  Then we played at whist and I won.  About 10 o'clock we went to breakfast and I ate some boiled rice.”  Another undated entry showed that cricket was not just an early-morning pastime:  “About 10 o'clock Dr. Blair, and Major and Captain Harrison came to see us. After I had given them a glass of sack we played cricket. I ate boiled beef for my dinner. Then we played at shooting with arrows...and went to cricket again till dark."

 

Wright, Louis B., and Marion Tinling, eds., The Secret Diary of William Byrd of Westover 1709-1712 [Dietz Press, Richmond, 1941], pages 25-26 and 31.  We have no page reference for the third mention of cricket, which appears in a short article on Smithsonian.com, as accessed 1/20/2007.  Thanks to John Thorn for reference data [email of 2/1/2008].

 

1709.2 -- Kent vs. Surrey -- Cricket’s First County Match?

 

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1697_to_1725_English_cricket_seasons, accessed 10/17/08:

“The earliest known match involving county teams or at any rate teams bearing the names of counties. The match was advertised in the Post Man dated Saturday June 25, 1709. The stake was £50.

“Some authors have suggested the teams in reality were "Dartford and a Surrey village", but this contradicts evidence of patronage and high stakes. It is likely that Dartford, as the foremost Kent club in this period, provided not only the venue but also the nucleus of the team, but there is no reason at all to doubt that the team included good players from elsewhere in the county. The Surrey team will equally have been drawn from a number of Surrey parishes and subscribed by their patron.”

The Wikipedia entry credits the website “From Lads to Lords: The History of Cricket 1300-1787”, at http://www.jl.sl.btinternet.co.uk/stampsite/cricket/main.html

 

1709.3 -- Cat and Trap-ball Seen as Boys’ Games [The Men Play Foot-ball]

 

W. Winstanley and Successors, Poor Robin 1709. An almanack after a new fashion [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 176.  A selection begins, “Thus harmless country lads and lasses/ In mirth the time away so passes:/ Here men at foot-ball they do  fall;/ There boys at cat and trap-ball.”

 

1711.1 – Betty Was “a Romp at Stool-Ball”

 

“James before he beheld Betty, was vain of his strength, a rough wrestler . . . ; Betty [was] a publick Dancer at May-poles, a Romp at Stool-Ball.  He was always following idle Women, she playing among the Peasants; He a Country Bully, she a Country Coquet.”

 

Steele, Spectator number 71, May 22, 1711, page 2.   Provided by John Thorn, emails of 6/11/2007 and 2/1/2008.  The implication of the passage appears to be that women who played a game like stool-ball were unlikely  to be chaste. 

 

1712.1 -- Two Noblemen Blasted for Sunday Cricket Play, and for Betting Too

 

The Duke of Marlborough and Viscount Townsend are publicly criticized for currying favor with electors by playing cricket with children “on a Sabbath day,” and for wagering 20 guineas on the outcome.  Bateman cites and quotes from a broadsheet report on this match at The Devil and the Peers, or a Princely Way of Sabbath Breaking [source not otherwise identified] at Bateman, Anthony,“’More Mighty than the Bat, the Pen . . . ;‘  Culture,, Hegemony, and the Literaturisaton of Cricket,”  Sport in History, v. 23, 1 (Summer 2003), page 30.  John Thorn identifies the broadsheet as having been published by J. Parker [email of 2/1/2008].

 

1713.1 – Boston Magistrate Finds Trap Ball Clogging a Gutter

 

“I went on the Roof, and found the Spout next Slater’s  stopped . . . . Boston went up . . . came down a Spit, and clear’d the Leaden-throat, by thrusting out a Trap-Ball that stuck there.”

 

Thomas, M. H., ed., The Diary of Samuel Sewell 1674 – 1729, Volume II, 1710 – 1729 [Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1973], p. 718.  Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 18.  Sewall is known as the “Salem Witch Judge.”

 

1715.1 – Men Top Over Women in “Merry-Night” of Stoole Balle

 

“The Young Folks of this Town had a Merry-Night . . . .  The Young Weomen treated the Men with a Tandsey as they lost to them at a Game at Stoole Balle.”

 

T. Ellison Gibson, ed., Blundell’s Diary, Comprising Selections from the Diary of Nicholas Blundell, Esq. (Gilbert G. Walmsley, 1895), diary entry for May 14, 1715, page 134.  Note:  “Tandsey” presumably refers to tansey-cakes, traditionally linked to springtime games. 

 

 

1719.1 -- Trap and Stool-ball Help Set the Mood . . . Again

 

“Thus all our lives we’re Frolick and gay,/And instead of Court Revels we merrily Play/ At Trap and Kettles and Barley-break run,/ At Goff, and at Stool-ball, and when we have done/ These innocent Sports, we Laugh and lie down,/ And to each pretty Lass we give a green Gown.”

 

D’Urfey, Thomas, Wit and Mirth: or Pills to Purge Melancholy [London], Vol. 3, per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 177.  Note: This closely mimics the verse found above at #1671.1. 

 

1720.1 – Puritans Thwarted Fun, “Even at Stool-ball”

 

In a strong anti-Presbyterian tract, Thomas Lewis noted that among Puritans “all Games where there is any hazard of loss are strictly forbidden; as Tennis, Bowles and Billiards;  not so much as a Game at stool-ball for a Tansy, . . . upon Pain of Damnation.”

 

Thomas. Lewis, English Presbyterian Eloquence: Or, Dissenters Sayings Ancient and Modern (T. Bickerton, London, 1720), page 17.  Citation provided by John Thorn, email of 2/1/2008.

 

1720.2 -- Holiday in Kent:  Cricket, Stool-Ball, Tippling, Kissing

 

In 1907, a kindred spirit of ours reported [in a listserve-equivalent of the day] on his attempts to find early news coverage of cricket.  He reports on a 1720 article he sees as “the first newspaper reference I have yet found to cricket as a popular game:”

 

“The Holiday coming on, the Alewives of Islington, Kentish Town, and several adjacent villages . . . .  The Fields will swarm with Butchers’; Wives and Oyster-Women . . . diverting themselves with their Offspring, whilst their Spouses and Sweethearts are sweating at Ninepins, some at Cricket, others at Stool-Ball, besides an amorous Couple in every Corner . . . Much Noise and Cutting in the Morning; Much Tippling all Day; and much Reeling and Kissing at Night.”

 

Alfred F. Robbins, “Replies: The Earliest Cricket Report,” Notes and Queries: A Medium of Intercommunication for Literary Men, General Readers, Etc, September 7, 1907, page 191.  Provided by John Thorn, 2/8/2008, via email.  He reports his source as Read’s Weekly Journal, or British-Gazeteer, June 4, 1720, and advises that he has omitted phrases not “welcome to the modern taste.  Accessed via Google Books 10/18/2008.

 

 

1720.3 – Cricket in Kent; Londoners Beat Kent Eleven, But Two Are Konked Out

 

A month later [see #1720.2, above], Islington was in the news again.  The Postman reported on July 16, 1720 that:

 

“Last week a match was played in The White Conduit Fields, by Islington, between 11 Londoners on one side and elevent men of Kent on the other side, for 5s a head, at which time being in eager pursuit of the game, the Kentish men having the wickets, two Londoners striving [p.27/p.28] for expedition to gain the ball, met each other with such fierceness that, hitting their heads together, they both fell backwards without stirring hand or foot, and lay deprived of sense for a considerable time, and ‘tis not yet known whether they willl recover.  The Kentish men were beat.”  Thomas Moult, “The Story of the Game,” in Thomas Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960 – reprint from 1935), pp 27-28.

 

1722.1 – Scotch “Rogue” Prefers Cat/Dog Games to His Books

 

“In the Life of the Scotch Rogue, 1722, p.7, the following sports occur:  ‘I was but a sorry proficient in learning: being readier at Cat and Doug, cappy-hole, riding the hurley hacket, playing at kyles and dams, spang-bogle, wrestling, and foot-ball (and such other sports as we use in out country), than at my book.’”

 

Brand, John, Observations on the Popular Antiquities of Great Britain (George Bell and Sons, London, 1900), page 407.  The original source is presumably The Scotch Rogue; or, the Life and Actions of Donald Macdonald, a Highland Scot (Robert Gifford, London, 1706 and 1722). Note:   Confirm in original?  Can we confirm that this was in the 1706 printing, not only the 1722 printing?  Identify “cappy-hole?”  Citation provided by John Thorn, email of 2/1/2008.

 

1725c.1 – Wicket Played on Boston Common

 

“March, 15. Sam. Hirst [Sewall’s grandson, reportedly, and a Harvard ’23 man] LMc] got up betime in the morning, and took Ben Swett with him and went into the (Boston MA) Common to play at Wicket. Went before any body was up, left the door open; Sam came not to prayer; at which I was most displeased.

 

”March 17th.  Did the like again, but took not Ben with him.  I told him he could not lodge here practicing thus.  So he lodg‘d elsewhere.  He grievously offended me in persuading his Sister Hannam not to have Mr. Turall, without enquiring of me about it.  And play’d fast and loose in a vexing matter about himself in a matter relating to himself, procuring me great Vexation.”

 

Diary of Samuel Sewall, in Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society (Published by the Society, Boston, 1882) Volume VII – Fifth Series, page 372.

 

Note: Further comment on this entry is welcome, especially from wicket devotees; after all, this may be the initial wicket citation in existence (assuming that $1700c.2 is cannot be documented and that #1704.1 above is not ever confirmed as wicket).

 

1725.2 – Duke of Richmond Issues Challenge to Play Single-Wicket Cricket

 

“In 1725, he [the Duke of Richmond] challenged Sir William Gage in a two-a-side single-wicket competition. . . .”

 

Simon Rae, It’s Not Cricket: A History of Skulduggery, Sharp Practice and Downright Cheating in the Noble Game (Faber and Faber, 2001), page 57.  Note: is there a fuller account for tis match?  A primary source?

 

 

 

1726.1 -- Cricket Crowd is Eyed Nervously as Possibly Seditious

 

An Essex official worries that a local game of cricket was simply a way of collecting a crowd of disaffected people in order to foment rebellion.  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 16.  Ford does not provide a citation for this account.

 

1727.1 -- First Documented Cricket Playing Rules Agreed to, for One-time Use

 

Two sides forged “Articles of Agreement” that specify 12 players to a side, a 23-yard pitch, two umpires to be named by each side, and “mentions catches but not other forms of dismissal.”  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 16.  Note: Ford does not provide a citation for this account.

 

1727.2 -- How To Score at Cricket, Olde Style

 

In order to score a run, a batsman/runner had to touch a staff held by an umpire with his bat.  The modern rule appeared in the 1744 rules.

 

Scholefield, Peter, Cricket Laws and Terms [Axiom Publishing, Kent Town Australia, 1990], page 22.

 

1728.1 – Delaware Resident Writes of Playing Trap Ball, with Cider as Reward

 

“James Gordon & I Plaid Trabbel against John Horon and Th Horon for an anker of Syder We woun.  We drunk our Syder.”

 

Hancock, H. B., ed., “’Fare Weather and Good Helth:’ the Journal of Caesar Rodeney, 1727 – 1729,” Delaware History, volume 10, number 1 [April 1962], p. 64. Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It,  ref # 19.

 

1730c.1 – Low Wicket and Circular Hole Said Still Found in Cricket

 

“In the infancy of the game [cricket] the batsman stood before a circular hole in the turf, and was put out, as in ‘rounders,’ by being caught, or by the ball being put in this hole.  A century and a half ago this hole was still in use, though it had on each side a stump only one foot high, with a long cross-bar of two feet in length laid on top of them.”

 

Robert MacGregor, Pastimes and Players (Chatto and Windus, London, 1881), page 4, accessed 1/30/10 via Google Books search (“pastimes and players”).  MacGregor gives no source for this claim.  Note that MacGregor does not say that such practice was uniformly used in this period.  Query: have later writers specified in more detail when the hole and the low long wicket disappeared from cricket?

 

 

1730c.2 – Cricket Play at Eton Seen as Common

 

“I can’t say I am sorry I was never quite a school-boy: an expedition against bargemen or a match at cricket may be very pretty things to recollect; but thank my stars, I can remember things very near as pretty.”

 

Letter from Horace Walpole to George Montagu, May 6, 1736.  One interpretation of this letter:  “Horace Walpole was sent to Eton in 1726.  Playing cricket, as well as bashing bargemen, was common at that time:” Pycroft, John, The Cricket Field; or, The History and the Science of the Game of Cricket, second edition (Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London, 1854), page 43.

 

 

1731.1 – Patient Thousands Watch First Known Drawn Match in Cricket

 

“The Great Cricket Match, between the Duke of Richmond and Mr. Chambers, 11 men on each side, for 200 Guineas, was begun to be played on Monday at two in the Afternoon, on Richmond Green.  By agreement they were not to play after 7 o’clock. . . . when the Hour agreed being come, they were obliged to leave off, tho’ beside the Hands then playing, they [chambers’ side] had 4 or 5 more to have come in.  Thus it proved a drawn Battle.  There were many Thousand Spectators, of whom a great number were Persons of Distinction of both Sexes.” 

 

Source: The Daily Journal, August 25, 1731, as uncovered by Alfred Robbins in his 1907 digging.  Robbins finds the article of “historical interest, for it is the earliest I have yet traced of a drawn game.”  Alfred Robbins, “The Earliest Cricket Report,” Notes and Queries: A Medium of Intercommunication for Literary Men, General Readers, Etc., September 7, 1907, page 192.  Note: does this match still stand as the first recorded drawn match?

 

1733.1 -- Long Poem Describes Stool-Ball in Some Detail; First Evidence of Use of a Bat

 

The London Magazine, vol 2, December 1733 [London], page 637, per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 177.  Block calls this account “the most complete and detailed portrayal of the game to date.”  It provides the earliest reference to the use of a bat, describes a game that does not involve running after the young [female] players hit the ball, and includes a description of the field and the assembled audience.  Note: A bat had been described in Willughby’s c.1672 account of hornebillets.  Some actual text should be added here, if it can be captured.

 

 

1737.1 -- Surreymen Play Londoners in Cricket for 500 Pounds a Side

 

 

“On Wednesday next a great Match at Cricket is to be play’d at Moulsey-Hurst in Surrey, between eleven Men of the said County, chose by his Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, and the same Number chose out of the London Club by his Grace the Duke of Marlborough, for 500 [pounds] a Side.”  Country Journal of The Craftsman (London), July 16, 1737.  Excavated by John Thorn, 2/1/2008.  Note:  So who won?  And was the bet really paid off? 

 

 

1737.2 – Doctor Writes of North Carolina Game Resembling Ireland’s Trap Ball

 

Brickell, an Irishman, writes of NC Indians: “They have [a] game which is managed with a Battoon, and very much resembles our Trap-ball.”

 

Brickell, John., The Natural History of North Carolina [James Carson, Dublin, 1737], p. 336.  Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 20. 

 

1737.3 – Cricket Played Georgia Town Square

 

Georgia planter William Stephens: “Many of our Townsmen, Freeholders, Inmates, and Servants were assembled in the principal Square, at Cricket and divers other athletick Sports.”

 

A Journal of the Proceedings in Georgia, II, page 217, as cited in  Lester, ed., A Century of Philadelphia Cricket [U Penn, 1951], page 4. Lester cites this account as the first mention of American cricket.

 

1739.1 -- First Known Picture of Cricket Appears

 

 

“The earliest known cricket picture was first displayed in 1739.  It is an engraving call “The Game of Cricket”, by Hubert-Francois Gravelot (1699-1773) and shows two groups of cherubic lads gathered around a batsman and a bowler.  The wicket shown is the “low stool” shape, probably 2 feet wide and 1 foot tall, with two stumps and a single bail.”  Received in an email from John Thorn, 2/1/2008.  Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1739_English_cricket_season. 

 

Another fan’s notes:  “Art is immortal, and the M.C.C. has acquired a new work of Art in connection with cricket.  This is a drawing in pencil on grey paper, representing a country game in the [eighteenth] century. . . .  The two notched stumps with one bail are only about six inches high, and the bowler appears to be “knuckling” the ball like a marble.  I have very little doubt that the artist was Gravelot.”  Andrew Lang, “At the Sign of the Ship,” Longmans’ Magazine (London) Number LXIX, July 1888, page 332.

 

On 2/24/10, an image was available via a Google Web search (christies "gravelot (1699-1773)" cricket).

 

 

1740s.1 – Intervillage Cricket Played by Women in Surrey and Sussex

 

Cashman, Richard, “Cricket,” in David Levinson and Karen Christopher, Encyclopedia of World Sport: From Ancient Times to the Present [Oxford University Press, 1996], page 88.

 

1740.2 -- Almanack Sees Time Wasted at Stool-ball

 

“Much time is wasted now away/ At pigeon-holes and nine-pin play/. . . ./ At stool-ball and at barley-break,/Wherewith they at harmless pastime make.”

 

W. Winstanley and Successors, Poor Robin 1740. An almanack after a new fashion [London], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 178. 

 

1740.3 – Lord Chesterfield Nods Approvingly at Cricket – and Trap Ball!

 

“Dear Boy: . . . Therefor remember to give yourself up entirely to the thing you are doing, be it what it will, whether your book or play: for if you have a right ambition, you will desire to excell all boys of your age at cricket, or trap ball, as well as in learning.”  P.D.S. Chesterfield, Lord Chesterfield’s Letters of His Son (M. W. Dunne, 1901), Volume II, Letter LXXI, to his son.  Citation provided by John Thorn, email of 2/1/2008.

 

Cited by Steel and Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890), pp 8 - 9.. Steel and Lyttelton introduce this quotation as follows:  “When once the eighteenth century is reached cricket begins to find mention in literature.  Clearly the game was rising in the world and was being taken up, like the poets of the period, by patrons.” 

 

 

1741c.1 – Does Alexander Pope “Sneer” at Cricket in Epic Poem?

 

“The judge to dance his brother serjeant call,

The senator at cricket urge the ball”

 

Pope, “The Dunciad,” per Steel and Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 9.  Steel and Lyttelton date the writing to 1726-1735.  Their remark:  “Mr. Alexander Pope had sneered at cricket.  At what did Mr. Pope not sneer?”

 

Alexander Pope, The Dunciad, Complete in Four Books, According to Mr. Pope’s Last Improvements (Warburton, London, 1749), Book IV, line 592, page 70.  Note; This fragment does not seem severely disparaging.  Is it clear from context what offense he gives to cricketers?  It is true that this passage demeans assorted everyday practices, particularly as pursued by those of high standing.  Book IV, the last, is now believed to have been written in 1741.  Other entries that employ the “urge the ball” phrasing are #1747.1, #1805c.7, #1807.3, and #1824.4.

 

 

1743.1 – Editorial:  Cricket is OK, But Only for Rural Holiday Play

 

“Cricket is certainly a very innocent and wholesome, yet it may be abused if either great or little people make it their business.  It is grossly abused when it is made the subject of publick advertisements to draw together great crowds of people who ought all of them to be somewhere else.

 

“The diversion of cricket may be proper in holiday time, and in the country, but upon days when men ought to be busy, and in the neighbourhood of a great city, it is not only improper, but mischievous, to a high degree.  It draws number of people from their employments to the ruins of their families . . . it gives the most open encouragement to gaming.”

 

British Champion, September 8, 1743.  Provided by Gregory Christiano, 12/2/09, as reprinted in The Gentlemans Magazine, 1743.  The piece appears, perhaps in its entirety, in W. W. Read, Annals of Cricket (St. Dunston’s Press, 1896), page 27ff [accessed 1/30/10 via Google Books search (“very innocent” “annals of cricket”)].

 

 

1743.2 – Three-on-Three Cricket Match, A Close One, Draws Reported 10,000 Fans

 

“July 11.  In the Artillery Ground.  Three of Kent – Hodswell, J. Cutbush, V. Romney vs. Three of England – R. Newland, Sawyer, John Bryan.  Kent won by 2 runs.”

 

Cited in Thomas Moult, “The Story of the Game,” Thomas Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960 – reprinted from 1935), page 29.  Moult’s commentary:  “Several features of this match are to be emphasized [besides the fact that the score was reported, not simply the name of the winning side -- LM].  The convention of eleven a side was not yet established . . . .  Also the match was played before 10,000 spectators.”  Note: Moult does not cite the original source.

 

 

1743.3 – When Cricket Still Had Foul Ground?

 

“We may see how the game was played about this time from the picture, of date 1743, in the possession of the Surrey County Club.  The wicket was a ‘skeleton hurdle,’ one foot high and two feet wide, consisting of two stumps only, with a third laid across.  The bat was curved at the end, and made for free hitting rather than defence.  The bowling was all along the ground, and the great art was to bowl under the bat.  All play was forward of the wicket, as it is now in single wicket games of less that five players a side.  With these exceptions, the game was very much the same as it is today [1881].” 

 

Robert MacGregor, Pastimes and Players (Chatto and Windus, London, 1881), page 16.  Note that the circular hole, described in #1730.1, is not seen.  Caveat: It is not clear from this account whether forward hitting was common in the 1740s or whether MacGregor is simply drawing inferences about this single painting.

 

1744.1 – First Laws of Cricket are Written

 

Includes the 4-ball over, later changed to 6 balls.  [And to 8 balls in Philadelphia in 1790].  Cashman, Richard, “Cricket,” in David Levinson and Karen Christopher, Encyclopedia of World Sport: From Ancient Times to the Present [Oxford University Press, 1996], page 87.  The 22 yard pitch is one-tenth of the length of a furlong, which is an eighth of a mile.

 

Ford’s crisp summary of the rules:  “Toss for pitching wickets and choice of innings; pitch 22 yards; single bail; wickets 22 inches high; 4-ball overs; ball between 5 and 6 ounces; ‘no ball’ defined; modes of dismissal -- bowled, caught, stumped, run out, obstructing the field.”  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 17.

 

The rules are listed briefly at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1744_English_cricket_season [as assessed 1/31/07].  The rules were written by a Committee under the patronage of “the cricket-mad Prince of Wales,” Frederickm, son of George II.

 

 

1744.2 – Newbery’s Little Pretty Pocket-Book Refers to “Base-Ball,” “Stooleball, “Trap-Ball,”

 

John Newbery’s A Little Pretty Pocket-Book, published in England, contains a wood-cut illustration showing boys playing “base-ball” and a rhymed description of the game:  “The ball once struck off,/Away flies the boy/To the next destined post/And then home with joy.” .  This is held to be the first appearance of the term “base-ball” in print.  Other pages are devoted to stool-ball, trap-ball, and tip-cat [per David Block, page 179].  Block finds that this book has the first use of the word “base-ball.”

 

Little Pretty Pocket-Book, Intended for the Instruction and Amusement of Little Master Tommy and Pretty Miss Polly [London, John Newbery, 1744].  Per RH ref 107, adding Newbery name as publisher from text at p. 132.  The earliest extant version of this book is from 1760 [per David Block]. Note: we may need reason to assume the “Base-ball” poem appeared in the 1744 version.  According to Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, the 1767 London edition also has poems titled “Stoolball” [p. 88] and Trap-Ball.[p. 91].  According Zoernik in the Encyclopedia of World Sports [p.329], rounders is also referred to [we need to confirm this].  There was an American pirated edition in 1760, as per Henderson [ref #107]; David Block dates the American edition in 1762. He also notes that a 1767 revision features engravings for the three games.

 

 

1744.3 -- Earliest Full Cricket Scorecard for the “Greatest Match Ever Known”

 

The match it describes: All England vs. Kent, played at the Artillery Ground.  The same year, admission at the Ground increased from tuppence to sixpence. Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 17. 

 

John Thorn [email of 2/1/2008] located an account of the match:  “Yesterday was play’d in the Artillery-Ground the greatest Cricket-Match even known, the County of Kent again all England, which was won by the former [the score was  97-96 – LM] . . . . There were present the their Royal Highnesses the Princeof Wales and Duke of Cumberland, the Duke of Richmond, Admiral Vernon, and many other Persons of Distinction.”  The London Evening-Post Number 2592, June 16-19, 1744, page 1 column 3, above the fold.  Note:  Is the scorecard available somewhere?

 

 

1744.4 – Poet:  “Hail Cricket!  Glorious Manly, British Game!

 

Writing as James Love, the poet and actor James Dance [1722-1774] penned a 316-line verse that extols cricket.  The poem, it may surprise you to learn, turns on the muffed catch by an All England player [shades of Casey!] that, I take it, allows Kent County to win a close  match.  Protoball’s virtual interview with Mr. Dance:

 

Protoball:  Are you a serious cricket fan?

 

Dance:" Hail, cricket! Glorious manly, British Game! / First of all Sports! be first alike in Fame!” [lines 13-14]

 

PBall: Isn’t billiards a good game too?

 

Dance: “puny Billiards, where, with sluggish Pace / The dull Ball trails before the feeble Mace” [lines 40-41]

 

PBall: But you do appreciate tennis, right?”

 

Dance:  “Not Tennis [it]self, [cricket’s] sister sport can charm, /Or with [cricket’s] fierce Delights our Bosoms warm".[lines 55-56] . . . to small Space confined, ev’n [tennis] must yield / To nobler CRICKET, the disputed field.”  [lines 60-61]

 

PBall: But doesn’t every country have a fine national pastime?

 

Dance: “Leave the dissolving Song, the baby Dance, / To Sooth[e] the Slaves of Italy and France: / While the firm Limb, and strong brac’d Nerve are thine [cricket’s] / Scorn Eunuch Sports; to manlier Games [we] incline” [lines 68-71]

 

PBall: Manlier?  You see the average cricketer as especially manly?

 

Dance:  “He weighs the well-turn’d Bat’s experienced Force, / And guides the rapid Ball’s impetuous course, / His supple Limbs with Nimble Labour plies, / Nor bends the grass beneath him as he flies.”  [lines 29 – 32]

 

James Love, Cricket: an Heroic Poem. illustrated with the Critical Observations of Scriblerus Maximus(W. Bickerton, London, undated)  The poet writes of a famous 1744 match between All England and Kent [#1744.3, above.]  Thanks to Beth Hise for a lead to this poem, email, 12/21/2007.   John Thorm, per email of 2/1/2008, located and pointed to online copy.  Note:  Are we sure the versified game account is from the 1744 Kent/England match -- not 1746, for example? 

 

1745c.1 -- John Adams Recalls Youthful Bat and Ball Play

 

Saying that his first fifteen years “went off like a fairy tale,” John Adams [1735-1826] wrote fondly “of making and sailing boats  . . swimming, skating, flying kites and shooting marbles, bat and ball, football, . . . wrestling and sometimes boxing.”

 

David McCullough, John Adams [Touchstone Books, 2001], page 31.  Submitted by Priscilla Astifan, 11/17/06.

 

1747.1 – Poet Thomas Gray:  “Urge the Flying Ball.”

 

“What idle progeny succeed

To chase the rolling circle's speed,

Or urge the flying ball?”

 

Thomas Gray, "Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College,” lines 28-30.  Accessed 12/29/2007 at http://www.thomasgray.org.  “Rolling circle” had been drafted as “hoop,” and thus does not connote ballplay.  Cricket writers have seen “flying ball” as a cricket reference, but a Gray scholar cites “Bentley’s Print” as a basis for concluding that Gray was referring to trap ball in this line.  Steel and Lyttelton note that this poem was first published in 1747.  Note: is it fair to assume that Gray is evoking student play at Eton in this ode?  Do modern scholars agree with the 1747 publication date?

 

1747.2 – Well-Advertised Women’s Cricket Match Held, with 6-Pence Admission

 

In July 1747 two ladies’ sides from Sussex communities played cricket at London’s Artillery-Grounds, and the announced admittance fee was sixpence.  At a first match, according to a 7/15/1747 news account, play was interrupted when “the Company broke in so, that it was impossible for the [match] to be play’d; and some of them [the players? – LM] being very much frighted, and others hurt . . . .”  That match was to be completed on a subsequent morning . . . . “And in the Afternoon they wil play a second Match at the same Place, several large Sums being depended between the Women of the Hills of Sussex, in Orange colour’d Ribbons, and the Dales in blue!”

 

This item was contributed by David Block on 2/27/2008.  David notes that the source is a large scrapbook with thousands of clippings from 1660 to 1840 as collected by a Daniel Lysons: “Collectanea: or A collection of advertisements and paragraphs from the newspapers, relating to various subjects.  Publick exhibitions and places of amusement,” Vol IV, Pt 2, page 227, British Library shelfmark C.103.k.11.  David adds, “Unfortunately, Lysons, or whoever assembled this particular volume, neglected to indicate which paper the clippings were cut from.”

 

 

1748.1 – Lady Hervey Reports Royals’ “Base-ball” in a Letter

 

Lady Hervey (then Mary Leppel) describes in a letter the activities of the family of Frederick, Prince of Wales: 

 

“[T]he Prince’s family is an example of innocent and cheerful amusements  All this last summer they played abroad; and now, in the winter, in a large room, they divert themselves at base-ball, a play all who are, or have been, schoolboys, are well acquainted with.  The ladies, as well as gentlemen, join in this amusement . . . .  This innocence and excellence must needs give great joy, and well as great hope, to all real lovers of their country and posterity.”

 

[The last sentence may well be written in irony, as Lady Hervey was evidently known to be unimpressed with the Prince’s conduct.]

 

Hervey, Lady (Mary Lepel), Letters (London, 1821), p.139 [Letter XLII, of November 14, 1748, from London]. Google Books now has uploaded the letters:  search for “Lady Hervey.”  Letter 52 begins on page 137, and the baseball reference is on page 139.  Accessed 12/29/2007.  Note: David Block, page 189, spells the name “Lepel,” citing documented family usage; the surname often appears as “Leppell.”  In a 19CBB posting of 2/15/2008, David writes that it is “George III, to whom we can rightly ascribe the honor of being the first known baseball player.  The ten-year-old George, as [Prince] Frederick’s eldest son, was surely among the prince’s family members observed by Lady Hervey in 1748 to be ‘divert[ing] themselves at base-ball.’”

 

1749.1 -- Early Cricket: Addington Club Takes On  All-England, Five on Five

 

“A newspaper advertisement announced a match on the [London Artillery] ground on July 24th, 1749, between five of the Addington Club and an All England five.  The advertisement gave the names of the players, and thus concluded: NB -- The last match, which was played on Monday the 10th instant, was won by All England, notwithstanding it was eight to one on Addington in the playing.’”

 

Joseph Strutt, The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England [Methuen, London, 1903], page 102.  This edition of Strutt [originally published in 1801] was “much enlarged and corrected by L. Charles Cox;” the cited text was inserted by Cox.

 

1750c.1 -- Cricket No Longer Played Only With Rolled Deliveries to Batsmen

 

“Originally bowling literally meant ‘to bowl the ball along the ground’ as in the style of lawn bowls.  By 1750, however, a mixture of grubbers and fully pitched balls were seen.”

 

Peter Scholefield, Cricket Laws and Terms [Axiom Publishing, Kent Town Australia], page 34.

 

1750s.2 – Town Ball and Cat Played in NC Lowlands?

 

One biographer has estimated:  “Of formalized games, choices for males [in NC] appear to have been ‘town-ball, bull-pen,’ ‘cat,’ and ‘prisoner’s base,’ whatever exhibitions of dexterity they may have involved” Chalmers G. Davidson, Piedmont Partisan: The Life and Times of Brigadier-General William Lee Davidson (Davidson College, Davidson NC, 1951), page 20.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), page 32. 

 

Caution: This is a very early claim for town ball, preceding even New England references to roundball or like games.  It would be useful to examine C. Davidson’s sources.  Note:  Can we determine what region of NC is under discussion?  Text of the biography is unavailable via Google Books as of 11/15/2008.  Prisoner’s base is not a ball game, and bull-pen is not a safe-haven game.

 

 

1750s.3 – 1857 Writer Reportedly Dates New England Game of “Base” to 1750s

 

“an interesting report from a “Base Ball Correspondent” which discusses the early New England game of “Base” and mentions in part that ‘Base ball has, no doubt, been played in this country for at least one century. . . .  Details about the “National Base Ball Club” of Brooklyn.”  “Out-Door Sports: Base Ball: Base Ball Correspondence,” Porter’s Spirit of the Times Volume 3, number 8 (October 24, 1857), page 117, column 2.  Citation provided by Craig Waff, 10/28/2008.  The text of the October 20 letter from “X” is on the VBBA website at:

http://www.vbba.org/ed-interp/1857x1.html

 

The game described by “X” resembles the MA game as it was to be codified a year later except: [a] “a good catcher would frequently take the ball before the bat cold strike it,” [b] the runner “was allowed either a pace or jump to the base which he was striving t reach,” [c] the bound rule was in effect, [d] all-out-side-out innings, [e] the ball was “softer and more spongy” than 1850’s ball, [f] the bats were square, flat, or round,” and [g] there was a layout variation, with three bases, one two yards to the batters right, the next “about fifty [yards] down the field,” and the third was “about five.”  This field variation reminds one of cricket, wicket, and “long town [or “long-town-ball].”

 

 

1751.1 – First Recorded US Cricket Match Played, “For a Considerable Wager,” in NYC

 

“Last Monday afternoon, a match at cricket was play’d on our Common for a considerable Wager, by eleven Londoners, against eleven New Yorkers:  The game was play’d according to the London Method; and those who got most notches in two Hands, to be the Winners: The New Yorkers went in first, and got 81; Then the Londoners went in, and got but 43; Then the New Yorkers went in again, and got 86; and the Londoners finished the Game with getting only 37 more.”  New York Gazette Revived, May 6, 1751, page 2, column 2.  Submitted 7/25/2005 by George Thompson.

 

This was the first recorded cricket match played in New York City, and took place on grounds where Fulton Fish Market now stands, “by a Company of Londoners – the London XI -- against a Company of New Yorkers.” (The New Yorkers won, 167-80.)

 

New York Post-Boy, 4/29/51.  Per John Thorn, 6/15/04:  Source is multiple: clip from Chadwick Scrapbooks; see also, “the first recorded American cricket match per se was in New York in 1751 on the site of what is today the Fulton Fish Market in Manhattan.  A team called New York played another described as the London XI ‘according to the London method’ - probably a reference to the 1744 Code which was more strict that the rules governing the contemporary game in England.   Also, and dispositively, from Phelps-Stokes, Vol. VI, Index—ref. against Chronology and Chronology Addenda (Vol. 4A or 6A); [CRICKET] Match on Commons April 29, 1751; and finally, V. 4, p. 628, 4/29/1751: “…this day, a great Cricket match is to be played on our commons, by a Company of Londoners against a Company of New-Yorkers. New-York Post-Boy, 4/29/51.” The New Yorkers won by a total score of 167 to 80. New York Post-Boy, 5/6/51.  This game is also treated by cricket historians Wisden [1866] and Lester [1951].

 

1751.2 -- Cricket Lore:  Ball Kills the Prince of Wales?

 

RIP, sweet Prince.  [The prince was the father of King George III.]

 

Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 17: “Death of Frederick Lewis, Prince of Wales, as a result of a blow on the head from a cricket ball.”  Ford does not give a citation.

 

Others attribute the Prince’s death to a tennis incident; neither theory seems fully credible, as death was not immediate, and “an abscess” of the lung was believed to be the proximal cause of death.

 

 

1753.1 – NYS Traveler Notes Dutch boys “Playing Bat and Ball”

 

Gideon Hawley (1727-1807), traveling through the area where Binghamton now is, wrote: “even at the celebration of the Lord’s supper [the Dutch boys] have been playing bat and ball the whole term around the house of God.”

 

Hawley, Gideon, Rev. Gideon Hawley’s Journal [Broome County, NY 1753], page 1041. Collection of Tom Heitz. Per Patricia Millen, From Pastime to Passion [2001], page 2. 

 

1754.1 -- Marylanders Play “Great Cricket Match for a Good Sum”

 

“We hear that there is to be a great cricket match for a good sum played on Saturday next, near Mr. Aaron Rawling’s Spring, between eleven young men of this city [Annapolis] and the same number from Prince George’s County [now a Washington suburban community]”

 

Bradford’s Journal, August 1, 1754, as cited in Lester’s A Century of Philadelphia Cricket UPenn Press, Philadelphia, 1951], page 5.

 

1754.2 – Ben Franklin Brings Copy of Cricket Rules Back to U.S.

Several sources, including the Smithsonian, magazine, report that “The rules of the game on this side of the Atlantic were formalized in 1754, when Benjamin Franklin brought back from England a copy of the [ten year old – LMc] 1744 Laws, cricket’s official rule book.”  Simon Worrall, “Cricket, Anyone?” Smithsonian Magazine, October 2006.  The excerpt can be found in the seventh paragraph of the article [as accessed 10/19/2008] at:                                            

http://www.smithsonianmagazine.com/issues/2006/october/cricket.php:

Lester adds this:  “Benjamin Franklin was sufficiently interested in the game [cricket] to bring back with him from England a copy of the laws of cricket, for it was this very copy which was presented to the Young America Club . . .on June 4, 1867.”  Lester, A Century of Philadelphia Cricket (U Penn, 1951), page 5. Caveat: we have not located a contemporary account of the Franklin story.

 

1755.1 -- Johnson Dictionary Defines Stoolball and Trap

 

Stoolball is simply defined as “A play where balls are driven from stool to stool,” and trap is defined as “A play at which a ball is driven with a stick.”

 

Johnson, Samuel, A dictionary of the English language [London, 1755], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 179. 

 

1755.2 -- Laws of Cricket are Revised

 

“1755: Minor revision of the Laws of Cricket.” John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a source.

 

1755.3 – Young Man Goes to “Play at Base Ball” in Surrey

 

On the day after Easter in 1755, 18-year-old William Bray recorded the following entry in his diary:

 

“After Dinner Went to Miss Seale’s to play at Base Ball, with her, the 3 Miss Whiteheads, Miss Billinghurst, Miss Molly Flutter, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Ford, H. Parsons & Jolly.  Drank tea and stayed till 8.”

 

The story of this 2007 find is told in Block, David, “The Story of William Bray’s Diary,” Base Ball, volume , no. 2 (Fall 2007), pp. 5-11.

 

Block points out that this diary entry, is among the first four appearances of the term “base ball,” [see #1744.2 and #1748.1 above, and #1755.4 below] shows adult and mixed-gender play, and that “at this time, baseball was more of a social phenomenon than a sporting one. . . . played for social entertainment rather than serious entertainment.”  [Ibid, page 9.]

 

1755.4 – Satirist Cites Base-Ball as “An Infant Game”

 

“. . . the younger Part of the Family, perceiving Papa not inclined to enlarge upon the Matter, retired to an interrupted Party at Base-Ball, (an infant Game, which as it advances in its Teens, improves to Fives [handball], and in its State of Manhood, is called Tennis).

 

Kidgell, John, The Card (John Newbery, London, 1755), page 9.  This citation was uncovered in 2007 by David Block.  He tells the story of the find in Block, David, “The Story of William Bray’s Diary,” Base Ball, volume , no. 2 (Fall 2007), pp. 9-11.

 

1755.5 – Authoritative Rules of Cricket Published Nationally in England

 

The publication is The Game at Cricket; as Settled by the Several Cricket-Clubs, Particularly that of the Star and Garter in Pall Mall (London, 1755). 

 

Contributed by Beth Hise, January 12, 2010.  Beth adds: “This is the first discrete publication of the laws of cricket, a version of which was printed in the New Universal Magazine, and as such enabled the laws to be widely distributed.  This is the version generally regarded as containing the original laws of cricket.”

 

1756.1 -- First Recorded Game by Hambledon Cricket Club

 

“1756: The Hambledon Club plays its first recorded game.”  John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a source.

 

1760s.1 – Harvard Man Recalls Cricket, “Various Games of Bat and Ball” on Campus

 

Writing of the Buttery on the Harvard campus in Cambridge MA, Sidney Willard later recalled that “[b]esides eatable, everything necessary for a student was there sold, and articles used in the play-grounds, as bats, balls, &c. . . . [w]e wrestled and ran, played at quoits, at cricket, and various games of bat and ball, whose names perhaps are obsolete.” 

 

Sidney Willard, Memories of Youth and Manhood [John Bartlett, Cambridge, 1855], volume 1, pp 31 and 316.  Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 44.

 

 

1760.2 – Bat and Ball . . . in Paris?

 

A description of Parisian sights:  “The grand Walk forms a most beautiful Visto, which terminates in a Wood called Elysian Fields, or more commonly known by the name “La Cours de la Rein (Queen’s Course).  This is the usual place where the Citizens celebrate their Festivals with the Bat and Ball, a Diversion which is much used here.”  Provided by David Block, 2/27/2008.  Note: Is this the same location as what we now know as the Champs Elysee?   Can we learn what bat/ball games were so popular the mid 1700s – Soule? Some form of street tennis? A form of field hockey?  Not croquet, presumably.

 

 

1761.1 – Princeton Faculty [NJ] Disparages “Playing at Ball”

 

“A minute of the Princeton faculty of May, 1761, frowns upon students “playing at ball.”

 

Bentley, et. al., American College Athletics [Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York, 1929], pages 14-15.  Submitted by John Thorn, 6/6/04.

 

1761.2 -- School Rule in PA; No Ballplaying in the College Yard, Especially in Front of Trustees and Profs

 

“None shall climb over the Fences of the College Yard, or come in or out thro the Windows, or play Ball or use any Kind of Diversion within the Walls of the Building; nor shall they in the Presence of the Trustees, Professors or Tutors, play Ball, Wrestle, make any indecent Noise, or behave in any way rudely in the College Yard or Streets adjacent.”

 

Sack, Saul, History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, vol. 2 [Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg, 1963], page 632.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.  Note: do we know the college?  UPa?

 

1762.1 – Pirated Version of Little Pretty Book Uses Term “Base-ball.”

 

Note:  This version, published in 1762 by Hugh Gaine, was advertised in The New York Mercury on August 30, 1762, but no copy has been found.   Per RH, p. 135.  Henderson says that this is the first use of “base-ball” in an American source.  In his note #107, RH gives 1760 as the year of publication.

 

1762.2 – Salem Ordinance Outlaws Bat-and-Ball, Cricket

 

“. . . no Person shall use the Exercise of playing or kicking of Foot-ball, or the Exercise of Bat-and-Ball, or Cricket, within the Body of the Town, under a Penalty of One Shilling and Six Pence.”

 

By-Laws and Orders of the town of Salem, July 26, 1762, as printed in the Essex Gazette, December 6 to 13, 1768, page 81: posted to 19CBB on July 30, 2007 by Richard Hershberger.  The town is Salem MA.

 

1766.1 – Cricket Balls Advertised in US by James Rivington

 

In 1766 “James Rivington imported battledores and shuttlecocks, cricket-balls, pillets, best racquets for tennis and fives, backgammon tables with men, boxes, and dice.”

 

Singleton, Esther, Social New York Under the Georges [New York, 1902], page 265.  [Cited by Dulles, 1940.]  Caveat:  Singleton does not provide a source at this location; however, from context [see pp. 91-92] her direct quotation seems likely to be taken from a contemporary Rivington advertisement.  Caution: John Thorn is unable to find online evidence of cricket ball imports before 1772, per email of 2/2/2008.

 

1766.2 -- Cricket [or Wicket?] Challenge in CT

 

“A Challenge is hereby given by the Subscribers, to Ashbel Steel, and John Barnard, with 18 young Gentlemen . . . to play a Game of BOWL for a Dinner and Trimmings . . . on Friday next.”  Connecticut Courant , May 5, 1766, as cited in John A. Lester, A Century of Philadelphia Cricket [University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1951], page 6.  Note:  is “game of bowl” a common term for cricket?  Could this not have been a wicket challenge, given the size of the teams?

 

1767.1 –  [Item #1767.1 has been moved to become 1754.1 above.]

 

1767.2 -- North-South Game of Cricket in Hartford CT

 

“Whereas a Challenge was given by Fifteen Men South of the Great Bridge in Hartford . . . the Public are hereby inform’d that that Challenged beat the Challengers by a great majority.  And said North side hereby acquaint the South Side, that they are not afraid to meet them with any Number they shall chuse . . . .”  Source: “Hartford and Her Sons and Daughters of the Year The Courant was Founded,” Hartford Daily Courant, 10/25/1914.  The original Courant notice was dated June 1, 1767.  Sleuthwork provided by John Thorn, email of 2/2/2008.

 

1768.1 -- “Old Boys of Westminster” Play Harrow in Cricket

 

“William Hickey plays in a match at Moulsey Hurst for the old boys of Westminster School against eleven old boys of Harrow.”  John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a source.

 

 

1770s.1 – British Soldiers Seek Amusements, Rebels Yawn

 

“the presence of large numbers of British troops quartered in the larger towns of the [eastern] seaboard brought the populace into contact with a new attitude toward play.  Officers and men, when off duty, like soldiers in all ages, were inveterate seekers of amusement.  The dances and balls, masques and pageants, ending in Howe’s great extravaganza in Philadelphia, were but one expression of this spirit.  Officers set up cricket grounds and were glad of outside competition. . [text refers to cock-fighting in Philadelphia, horseracing and fox hunts on Long Island, bear-baiting in Brooklyn].

 

“There is little indication, however, that the British occupation either broke down American prejudices against wasting time in frivolous amusements or promoted American participation and interest in games and sports.”

 

Krout, John A., The Pageant of America: Annals of American Sport (Oxford U Press, 1929), page 26.

 

 

1770.2 – Three-on-Three Cricket Match Played on 100-Guinea Bet

 

“On Friday last a cricket match was played on Barnet Common between Mess. Cock, and Draper and Athey, against Mess Grey, Langley, and Tapiter, for 100 guineas, which was won with great difficulty by the latter; they went against 44 notches, and beat by only one notch.”

 

Bingley’s Weekly Journal, Saturday, September 15, 1770.  Contributed by Gregory Christiano, 12/2/09.  Barnet is a borough of London located to the northwest of the city.

 

1770c.3 – Future Professor Sneaks a Smoke When He Can’t Play Bat and Ball

 

“When Saturday afternoon chanced to be rainy, and no prospect of bat and ball on the common, some half a dozen of us used now and then, to meet in an old wood-shed, that we shall never forget, and fume it away to our own wonderful aggrandizement.”

 

“Use of Tobacco from Dr. Waterhouse’s Lecture before Harvard University,” American Repertory, September 3, 1829 (“from the Columbian Centinel.”)  Accessed via subscription search, May 5, 2009.  From internal references, this appears to be an account the well-known public anti-smoking lecture by Professor Benjamin Waterhouse in November 1804. Caution: dating this reference requires some assumptions.  Waterhouse was born in 1754, and thus, if this recollection is authentic, he speaks of a penchant for ballplaying [and smoking] he held in his teens.  He was born at Newport, RI and remained there until 1780.

 

1771.1 -- Dartmouth President Finds Gardening “More Useful” Than Ballplaying

 

Dartmouth College’s founding president Eleazar Wheelock thought his students should “turn the course of their diversions and exercises for their health, to the practice of some manual arts, or cultivation of gardens and other lands at the proper hours of leisure.”  That would be “more useful” than the tendency of some non-Dartmouth students to engage in “that which is puerile, such as playing with balls, bowls and other ways of diversion.”  Dartmouth is in Hanover NH.

 

Eleazar Wheelock, A Continuation of the Narrative [1771], as quoted in W. D. Quint, The Story of Dartmouth College (Little, Brown, Boston, 1914) , page 246.  Submitted by Scott Meacham, 8/21/06.  Dartmouth is in Hanover NH.

 

1771.2 – Province of New Hampshire Prohibits Christmas “Playing With Balls” in the Streets

 

“[M]any disorders are occasioned within the town of Portsmouth . . . by boys and fellows playing with balls in the public street: . . . [when] there is danger of breaking the windows of any building, public or private, [they] may be ordered to remove to any place where there shall be no such danger.”

 

“An Act to prevent and punish Disorders usually committed on the twenty-fifth Day of December . . . ,“ 23 December 1771, New Hampshire (Colony) Temporary Laws, 1773 (Portsmouth, NH), page 53.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 25.

 

1771.3 – A Wider Bat? Even in Cricket, There’s Always a Joker

 

“There was no size limit [on a cricket bat] until 1771, when a Ryegate batsman came to the pitch with a bat wider than the wicket itself!  A maximum measurement was then drawn up, and this has remained the same since.” The Hambledon Committee new resolution, appearing two days later, specified that the bat much be no wider than 4.25 inches. The rule stuck.

 

Peter Scholefield, Cricket Laws and Terms [Axiom Publishing, Kent Town Australia, 1990], page 15.

 

 

1771.4 – Newspaper Quotes Odds for 2-Day London Cricket Match

 

“On Wednesday and Thursday Last a grand match at cricket was played in the Artillery ground, between the Duke of Dorset and  ___ Mann, Esq; which, being a strong contest, was won by his Grace, notwithstanding the odds on the second day were 12 to one in favor of Mr. Mann.

 

Bingley’s Weekly Journal, Saturday, September 14, 1771.  Contributed by Gregory Christiano, 12/2/09. 

 

1773.1 -- Surrey/Kent Cricket Match Draws 12,000, Spawns Poetic Duel

 

Surrey beat Kent at Bourne Paddock, July 19-21, 1773.  The Rev J. Duncombe described the match in a poem entitled “Surrey Triumphant; or, the Kentish-Men’s Defeat.  A New Ballad, Being a Parody on ‘Chevy Chase’,” which [cheeeeeky indeed] appeared in the Kentish Gazette of July 24.  Then “a Gentleman” penned a reply, “Kentish Cricketers.” This exchange is amply told in H. T. Waghorn, compiler, Cricket Scores, Notes, Etc. from 1730-1773 (Blackwood, London, 1899)pp 116 – 126.  Accessed via Google Books 10/19/2008.

 

 

1773.2 -- “Best” Cricket Bats Sold for Four Shillings Sixpence

 

Pett’s of Sevenoaks was selling “best bats” for 4s 6d.  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.

 

1773.3 – Ball-playing By Slaves is Eyed in SC

 

“We present as a growing Evil, the frequent assembling of Negroes in the Town [Beaufort, SC] on Sundays, and playing games of Trap-ball and Fives, which is not taken proper notice of by Magistrates, Constables, and other Parish Officers.”

 

Tom Altheer, Originals, Volume 2, Number 11 (November 2009), page 1.  Tom sees this reference as “possibly the earliest which refers to African Americans, slaves or also possibly a few free blacks, playing a baseball-type game [although it is not clear if it involved any running], and playing frequently.  Beaufort SC is about 40 miles NE of Savannah GA, near the coastline.

 

1774.1 -- Cricket Rules Adjusted -- Visitors Bat First, LBW Added

 

A “Committee of Noblemen and Gentlemen of Kent, Hampshire, Surrey, Sussex, Middlesex, and London” agree on rule changes.  Ford’s summary:  “Particular reference is made to the requirements of gambling.  Ball between 5.5 and 5.75 ounces.  LBW [leg-before-wicket, a form of batman interference -- LM] for the first time; short runs; visiting side gets the choice of pitch and first innings.  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.

 

Writing in 1890, Steel and Lyttelton say that “[t]he earliest laws of the game, or at least the earliest which have reached us, are of the year 1774:”  See A.G. Steel and R. H. Lyttelton, Cricket, (Longmans Green, London, 1890) 4th edition, page 12. 

 

 

1774.2 – Ah, The Good Ol’ Days: Cricket Now No Longer “Innocent Pastime”

 

“The game at cricket, which requires that utmost exertion of strength and agility, was followed, until of late years, for manly exercise, animated by a noble spirit of emulation. This sport has too long been perverted from diversion and innocent pastime to excessive gaming and public dissipation.”  Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser (London) August 23, 1774, Column 1, seventh paragraph.

 

1775.1 – Soldier in CT “Played Ball All Day”

 

“Wednesday the 6.  We played ball all day”

 

[Lyman, Simeon], “Journal of Simeon Lyman of Sharon August 10 to December 28, 1775,” in “Orderly Book  and Journals Kept by Connecticut Men While Taking Part in the American Revolution 1775 – 1778,” Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society, volume 7 [Connecticut Historical Society, 1899, p. 117.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 26.  Lyman was near New London CT.

 

1775.2 – Soldier in MA Played Ball

 

Thomas Altherr writes in 2008:  “Ephriam [Ephraim? – TA] Tripp, a soldier at Dorchester in 1775, also left a record, albeit brief, of ball playing: ‘Camping and played bowl,’ he wrote on May 30.  ‘Bowl’ for Tripp meant ball, because elsewhere he referred to cannonballs as ‘cannon bowls.’  On June 24 he penned: ‘We went to git our meney that we shud yak when we past muster com home and played bawl.’”  Note:  Dorchester MA, presumably?  Is it clear whether Tripp was a British soldier?  May 1775 was some months before an American army formed.

 

E. Tripp, “His book of a journal of the times in the year 1775 from the 19th day,” Sterling Memorial Library Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University:  “Diaries (Miscellaneous) Collection, Group 18, Box 16, Folder 267.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), page 39.

 

 

1776.1 -- Book on Juvenile Pastimes Comments on Trap Ball

 

Michel Angelo, Juvenile Sports and Pastimes [London], 2nd edition. per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 179.  The text decries the use of a broad flat bat instead of a thin round one, which had evidently been used formerly.

 

1776.2 – NJ Officer Plays Ball Throughout His Military Service

 

Elmer, Ebenezer, “Journal of Lieutenant Ebenezer Elmer, of the Third Regiment of New Jersey Troops in the Continental Service,” Proceedings of the New Jersey Historical Society [1848], volume 1, number 1, pp. 26, 27, 30, and 31, and volume 3, number 2, pp.98. Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 29.

 

1776c.3 – Revolutionary War Officer Plays Cricket, Picks Blueberries

 

“The days would follow without incident, one day after another.  An officer with a company of Pennsylvania riflemen [in Washington’s army] wrote of nothing to do but pick blueberries and play cricket.”  David McCullough, 1776 (Simon and Schuster, 2005), page 40.  McCullough does not give a source for this item.  Provided by Priscilla Astifan, 19CBB posting of 8/5/2008 and email of 11/16/2008.  McCullough notes that the majority of the army comprised farmers and skilled artisan [ibid, page 34].

 

1777.1 – Revolutionary War Prisoner Watches Ball-Playing in NYC Area

 

Sabine, William H. W., ed., The New York Diary of Lieutenant Jabez Finch of the 17th (Connecticut) Regiment from August 22, 1776 to December 15, 1777 [private printing, 1954], pp. 126, 127, and 162.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 34.

 

1777.2 – Mass. Sailor Plays Ball in English Prison

 

Held as a POW in Plymouth, England, Newburyport sailor Charles Herbert wrote on April 2, 1777: “Warm, and something pleasant, and the yard begins to dry again, so that we can return to our former sports; these are ball and quoits . . . ”

 

[Herbert, Charles], A Relic of the Revolution, Containing a Full and Particular Account of the Sufferings and Privations of All the American Prisoners Captured on the High Seas, and Carried to Plymouth, England, During the Revolution of 1776 [Charles S. Pierce, Boston, 1847], p. 109.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It [ref # 35].

 

1777.3 -- Cricket Gets Improved Wicket – A Third Stump Added

 

Says Ford: “Third (middle) stump introduced.”  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 18.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.

 

1778.1 – American Surgeon Sees Ball-Playing in English Prison

 

Coan, Marion, ed., “A Revolutionary Prison Diary: The Journal of Dr. Jonathan Haskins,” New England Quarterly, volume 17, number 2 [June 1944], p. 308.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 36.

 

1778.2 – Teamster Sees Soldiers Play Ball.

 

[Joslin, Joseph], “Journal of Joseph Joslin Jr of South Killingly A Teamster in the Continental Service March 1777 – August 1778, in “Orderly Book [sic?] and Journals Kept by Connecticut Men While Taking Part in the American Revolution 1775 – 1778,” Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society, volume 7 [Connecticut Historical Society, 1899, pp. 353 - 354.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 27.

 

1778.3 – MA Sergeant Found Some Time and “Plaid Ball”

 

Symmes, Rebecca D., ed., A Citizen Soldier in the American Revolution: The Diary of Benjamin Gilbert of Massachusetts and New York [New York State Historical Association, Cooperstown, 1980], pp. 30 and 49; and “Benjamin Gilbert Diaries 1782 – 1786,” G372, NYS Historical Association Library, Cooperstown.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 30.

 

1778.4 – Ewing Reports Playing “At Base” and Wicket at Valley Forge – with the Fataher of his Country

 

George Ewing, a Revolutionary War soldier, tells of playing a game of “Base” at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: “Exercisd in the afternoon in the intervals playd at base.  Caveat: It is unknown whether this was a ball game, rather than prisoner’s base, a form of tag.

 

Ewing also wrote: "[May 2d] in the afternoon playd a game at Wicket with a number of Gent of the Arty . . . .“  And “This day [May 4, 1778] His Excellency dined with G Nox and after dinner did us the honor to play at Wicket with us."

 

Ewing, G., The Military Journal of George Ewing (1754-1824), A Soldier of Valley Forge [Private Printing, Yonkers, 1928], pp 35 [“base”] and 47 [wicket].  Also found at John C. Fitzpatrick, The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799. Volume: 11. [U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1931]. page 348.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.  The text of Ewing’s diary is unavailable at Google Books as of 11/17/2008.

 

Also note:

“Q.  What did soldiers do for recreation?

“A:  During the winter months the soldiers were mostly concerned with their survival, so recreation was probably not on their minds.  As spring came, activities other than drills and marches took place.  “Games” would have included a game of bowls played with cannon balls and called “Long Bullets.”  “Base” was also a game – the ancestor of baseball, so you can imagine how it might be played; and cricket/wicket.  George Washington himself was said to have took up the bat in a game of wicket in early May after a dinner with General Knox! . . . Other games included cards and dice . . . gambling in general, although that was frowned upon.”

 

From the website of Historic Valley Forge; see --

http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/youasked/067.htm, accessed 10/25/02. Note: it is possible that the source of this material is the Ewing entry above, but we’re hoping for more details from the Rangers at Valley Forge.  In 2010, we’re still hoping.

 

1778.5 -- Cricket Game Played at Cannon’s Tavern, New York City

 

“The game of Cricket, to be played on Monday next, the 14th inst., at Cannon’s Tavern, at Corlear’s Hook. Those Gentlemen that choose to become Members of the Club, are desired to attend. The wickets to be pitched at two o’Clock

 

Per John Thorn, 6/15/04: from Phelps-Stokes, Vol. VI, Index—ref. against Chronology and Chronology Addenda (Vol. 4aA or 6A); also, Vol. V, p.1068 (6/13/1778): Royal Gazette, 6/13/1778. Later, the cricket grounds were “where the late Reviews were, near the Jews Burying Ground ” Royal Gazette, 6/17/1780.

 

1778.6 -- NH Loyalist Plays Ball in NY; Mentions “Wickett”

 

The journal of Enos Stevens, a NH man serving in British forces, mentions playing ball seven times from 1778 to 1781.  Only one specifies the game played in terms we know: “in the after noon played Wickett” in March of 1781.  C. K. Boulton, ed., “A Fragment of the Diary of Lieutenant Enos Stevens, Tory, 1777-1778,” New England Quarterly v. 11, number 2 (June 1938), pages 384-385, per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, reference #33.  Tom notes that the original journal is at the Vermont Historical Society in Montpelier VT.

 

1779.1 – Cricket Played On Grounds near NY’s Brooklyn Ferry.

 

August 9, 1779, match between Brooklyn and Greenwich Clubs. “A Set of Gentlemen” propose playing a cricket match this day, and every Monday during the summer season, “on the Cricket Ground near Brooklyn Ferry.” The company “of any Gentleman to join the set in the exercise” is invited. A large Booth is erected for the accommodation of spectators:” New York Mercury, 8/9/1779

 

Per John Thorn, 6/15/04:  from Phelps-Stokes, Vol. VI, Index—ref. against Chronology and Chronology Addenda (Vol. 4aA or 6A); Vol. V, p. 1092.

 

1779.2 – Lieutenant Reports Playing Ball, and Playing Bandy Wicket

 

“Samuel Shute, a New Jersey Lieutenant, jotted down his reference to playing ball in central Pennsylvania sometime between July 9 and July 22, 1779; ‘until the 22nd, the time was spent playing shinny and ball’ Incidentally, Shute distinguished among various sports, referring elsewhere in his journal to ‘Bandy Wicket.’ He did not confuse baseball with types of field hockey [bandy] and cricket [wicket] that the soldiers also played.”  -- Thomas Altherr.  Note: Gomme says that “bandy wicket” was a name for cricket in England. [XXX add cite here]

 

[Shute, Samuel], “Journal of Lt. Samuel Shute,” in Frederick Cook, ed., Journals of the Military Expedition of Major General John Sullivan against the Six Nations of Indians in 1779 [Books for Libraries Press, Freeport NY, reprint of the 1885 edition], p. 268. Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 28.

 

1779.3 – Revolutionary War Soldier H. Dearborn Reports Playing Ball in PA

 

Brown, Lloyd, and H. Peckham, eds., Revolutionary War Journals of Henry Dearborn 1775 – 1783  [Books for Libraries Press, Freeport NY, 1969 [original edition 1939]], pp 149 – 150.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 1.

 

1779.4 – French Official Sees George Washington Playing Catch “For Hours”

 

Chase, E. P., ed., Our Revolutionary Forefathers: The Letters of Francois Marquis de Barbe-Marbois during his Residence in the United States as Secretary of the French Legation 1779 – 1785 [Duffield and Company, NY, 1929], p. 114.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 32.

 

1779.5 -- Army Lieutenant Cashiered for “Playing Ball with Serjeants”

 

Lieutenant Michael Dougherty, 6th Maryland Regiment, was cashiered at a General Court Martial at Elizabeth Town on April 10, 1779, in part for a breach of the 21st article, 14th section of the rules and articles of war -- “unofficer and ungentlemanlike conduct in associating and playing ball with Serjeants on the 6th instant.”

 

Fitzpatrick, John C., ed., The Writings of George Washington from the Original Sources, 1745-1799, vol. 14 [USGPO, Washington, 1931], page 378.  Submitted 10/12/2004 by John Thorn.

 

1779.6 – Dartmouth College Fine for Ballplay – Two Shillings

 

“If any student shall play ball or use any other deversion [sic] that exposes the College or hall windows within three rods of either he shall be fined two shillings . . . “  In 1782 the protected area was extended to six rods. John King Lord, A History of Dartmouth College 1815-1909 (Rumford Press, Concord NH, 1913), page 593.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), page 35.  See also #1771.1.

 

1780.1 -- NYC Press Cites Cricket Matches to be Played in Summer

 

A cricket match is advertised to be played on this day, and continued every Monday throughout the summer, “on the Ground where the late Reviews were, near the Jews Burying Ground.”

 

Per John Thorn, 6/15/04: from Phelps-Stokes, Vol. VI, Index—ref. against Chronology and Chronology Addenda (Vol. 4aA or 6A); June 19, 1780. Vol. V, p. 1111, 6/19/1780: New York Mercury, June 19, 1780

 

1780.2 -- Challenges for Cricket Matches between Englishmen and Americans

 

On August 19, 11 New Yorkers issued this challenge: “we, in this public manner challenge the best eleven Englishmen in the City of New York to play the game of Cricket . . . for any sum they think proper to stake.”  On August 26, the Englishmen accepted, suggesting a stake of 100 guineas.  On September 6, the news was that the match was on: “at the Jew’s Burying-ground, WILL be played on Monday next . . . the Wickets to be pitched at Two O’Clock.”  We seem to lack a report of the outcome of this match.

 

Royal Gazette, August 19, 1780, page 3 column 4; August 26, 1780, page 2 column 2; and September 6, 1780, page 3 column 4.  Submitted by George Thompson, 8/2/2005.

 

 

1780.3 – [this entry was expanded and appears as #1779.6]

 

1780c.4 – “Round Ball” Believed to be Played in MA

 

“Mr. Stoddard believes that Round Ball was played by his father in 1820, and has the tradition from his father that two generations before, i.e., directly after the revolutionary war, it was played and was not then a novelty.”

 

Letter from Henry Sargent, Grafton MA, to the Mills Commission, May 23, 1905.  Stoddard was an elderly gentleman who had played round ball in his youth.  Note:  The Sargent letter also reports that Stoddard “believed that roundball was played as long ago as Upton became a little village.”  Upton MA was incorporated in 1735.  Caveat: One might ask whether a man born around 1830 can be certain about ballplaying 50 years and 100 years before his birth.

 

1780s.5 -- Diminished in its Range, Stoolball Still Played at Brighton

 

“The apparent former wide diffusion of stoolball was reduced in the 18th century to a few geographical survivals.  It was played in Brighton to celebrate a royal birthday in the 1780s and by the early 19th century appeared to be limited to a few Kent and Sussex Wealden settlements.”

 

John Lowerson, “Conflicting Values in the Revivals of a ‘Traditional Sussex Game,’ Sussex Achaeological Collections 133 [1995], page 265.  Lowerson’s source for the 1780s report seems to be F. Gale, Modern English Sports [London, 1885], pages 8 and/or 11.

 

1780s.6 – Newell Sees Baseball’s Roots in MA

 

Writing on early baseball in the year 1883, W. W. Newell says:

 

“The present scientific game . . . was known in Massachusetts, twenty years ago, as the ‘New York game.’  A ruder form of Base-ball has been played in some Massachusetts towns for a century; while in other parts of New England no game with the ball was formerly known except “Hockey.”  There was great local variety in these sports.”

 

Newell, William W., Games and Songs of American Children (Dover, New York, 1963 – originally published 1883) page 184.  Note:  The omission of wicket – and arguably cricket – from Newell’s account is interesting here.  The claim that hockey was seen as a ball game is also interesting.

 

1780c.7 –The Young Josiah Quincy of MA:  “My Heart was in Ball”

 

Josiah Quincy was sent off to Phillips Academy in about 1778 at age six.  It was a tough place.  “The discipline of the Academy was severe, and to a child, as I was, disheartening. . . [p24/25]. I cannot imagine a more discouraging course of education that that to which I was subjected. The truth was, I was an incorrigible lover of sports of every kind.  My heart was in ball and marbles.”  Biographer Edmund Quincy sets this passage in direct quotes, but does not provide a source.

 

Edmund Quincy, Josiah Quincy of Massachusetts (Fields, Osgood and Company, Boston, 1869), pages 24-25.. Per Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), page 36.  Accessed on 11/16/2088 via Google Books search for “’life of josiah quincy.’”

 

1781.1 – Teen Makes White Leather Balls for Officers’ Ball-Playing

 

Hanna, John S., ed., A History of the Life and Services of Captain Samuel Dewees, A Native of Pennsylvania, and Soldier of the Revolutionary and Last Wars [Robert Neilson, Baltimore, 1844], p. 265- 266.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref #37.

 

1781.2 – “Antient” Harvard Custom:  Freshmen Furnish the Bats, Balls

 

“The Freshmen shall furnish Batts, Balls, and Foot-balls, for the use of the students, to be kept at the Buttery.”

 

Rule 16, “President, Professors, and Tutor’s Book,” volume IV.  The list of rules is headed “The antient Customs of Harvard College, established by the Government of it.”

 

Conveyed to David Block, April 18, 2005, by Professor Harry R. Lewis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.  Dr. Lewis adds,  “The buttery was a sort of supply room, not just for butter.  Who is to say what the “Batts” and “Balls” were to be used for, but it is interesting that any bat and ball game could already have been regarded as ancient at Harvard in 1781.”

 

1781.3 – “Game at Ball” Variously Perceived at Harvard

 

-- And that no other person was present in said area, except a boy who, they say was playing with a Ball -- From the testimony some of the persons in the kitchen it appeared that the company there assembled were very noisy --That some game at Ball was played --That some of the company called on the Boy to keep tally; which Boy was seen by the same person, repeated by running after the Ball, with a penknife & stick in his hand, on which stick notches were cut --That a Person who tarried at home at Dr. Appleton's was alarmed by an unusual noise about three o'clock, & on looking out the window, saw in the opening between Hollis & Stoughton, four or five persons, two of whom were stripped of their coats, running about, sometimes stooping down & apparently throwing something . . .”  Posted to 19CBB by Kyle DeCicco-Carey [date?]  Source: Harvard College Faculty Records (Volume IV, 1775-1781), call number UAIII 5.5.2, page 220 (1781).  Harvard is in Cambridge MA.

 

1782.1—Cricket Match Scheduled for the Green, Near Shipyards,

 

Cricket is to be played on July 15th “on the green, near the Ship-Yards.” Royal Gazette, 7/13/1782, page 1 column 2.  Submitted by John Thorn 6/15/04 and extended by George Thompson, 8/2/2005.

 

1782.2 – Ball Played at Albany During War

 

Spear, John A., ed., “Joel Shepard Goes to War,” New England Quarterly, volume 1, number 3 [July 1928], p. 344.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 38.

 

1782.3 – NH Diarist Notes that Local Youths “Play Ball Before My Barn”

 

Stabler, Lois K., ed., Very Poor and of a Lo Make: The Journal of Abner Sanger [Peter E. Randall, Portsmouth NH, 1896], p. 416.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 74.

 

1784.1 – UPenn Bans Ball Playing Near Open University Windows

 

RULES for the Good Government and Discipline of the SCHOOL in the UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA [Francis Bailey, Philadelphia PA, 1784]. Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 41.

 

1784.2 – Seymour Notation Adverts to Evidence that Town Ball Was Exported to England

 

“Rounders not a serious game until 1889 in Britain.  But at least close resemblance.  Evidence Town Ball introduced by Amer. to Br. 1784 – between Rounders and Base Ball.”

 

Seymour, Harold – Notes in the Seymour Collection at Cornell University, Kroch Library Department of Rare and Manuscript Collections, collection 4809.  Note: it would be good to find such evidence soon.

 

1785.1 – Thomas Jefferson: Hunting is More Character-building Than Ballplaying

 

Jefferson:  “Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind.”

 

Thomas Jefferson [VA] letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785, in Julian P. Boyd, ed., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson [Princeton University Press, 1953], volume 8, p. 407.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 55.

 

 

1785.2 – Cricket, Long After Reaching Tazmania, Gets Past Hadrian’s Wall

 

“It is difficult to believe that the English soldiers who flooded into Scotland in 1745/1746 did not bring cricket with them, but evidence has not yet emerges.  The well-known ‘first cricket match in Scotland’ took place at Earl Cathcart’s seat at Schow Park, Alloa, in September 1785, when Hon. Colonel Talbot’s XI played the Duke of Atholl’s XI. . . . Most of the players were English: no further matches in Scotland followed from it.  However, a Scot, the Duke of Hamilton, had already joined the MCC, and a traveler hoping to inspect Hamilton Place in 1785 found that ‘as the Duke plays cricket every afternoon, strangers don’t get admittance then.’”  John Burnett, Riot, Revelry and Rout: Sport in Lowland Scotland before 1860 (Tuckwell Press, 2000), page 252. Burnett footnotes this passage The Scottish Antiquary, 11 (1897), 82.  Note: we don’t yet know which of the events are documented there.  

 

Another source reports that the Talbot/Atholl match was played on September 8, 1785, for 1000 pounds per man. L. Stephen and S. Lee, eds., Dictionary of National Biography (Macmillan, New York, 1908), entry on Thomas Graham, Baron Lynedoch, page 359.

 

 

1786.1 – “Baste Ball” Played at Princeton

 

“Baste Ball” is played by students on the campus of Princeton University in NJ.  From a student’s diary:

 “A fine day, play baste ball in the campus but am beaten for I miss both catching and striking the ball.”

 

Smith, John Rhea, March 22 1786, in “Journal at Nassau Hall,” Princeton Library MSS, AM 12800.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 44.  Also found in Gerald S. Couzens, A Baseball Album [Lippincott and Crowell, NY, 1980], page 15.  Per Guschov, page 153. 

 

An article has appeared about Smith’s journal.  See Woodward, Ruth, “Journal at Nassau Hall,” PULC 46 (1985), pp. 269-291, and PULC 47 (1986), pp 48-70.  Note:  Does this article materially supplement our appreciation of Smith’s brief comment?

 

 

1786.2 -- Game Called Wicket Reported in England

 

“The late game of Wicket was decided by an extraordinary catch made by Mr. Lenox, to which he ran more than 40 yards, and received the ball between two fingers.”  Morning Post and Daily Advertiser (London), 6/27/1786.  Provided by Richard Hershberger, email of 2/3/2008.  Richard adds: “I know of only one other English citation of “wicket” as the name of a game.  I absolutely do not assume that it was the same as the game associated with Connecticut.”

 

1787.1 – Ballplaying Prohibited at Princeton – Shinny or Early Base Ball?

 

“It appearing that a play at present much practiced by the smaller boys . . . with balls and sticks,” the faculty of Princeton University prohibits such play on account of its being dangerous as well as “low and unbecoming gentlemen students.”

 

Quoted without apparent reference in Henderson, pp. 136-7.  Sullivan, on 7/29/2005, cited Warnum L. Collins, “Princeton,” page 208, per Harold Seymour’s dissertation.  Wallace quotes the faculty minute [November 26, 1787] in George R. Wallace, Princeton Sketches: The Story of Nassau Hall (Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1894), page 77, but he does not cite Collins.  Caveat: Collins – and Wallace -- believed that the proscribed game was shinny, and Altherr makes the same judgment – see Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), pages 35-36.  Can we determine why this inference was made?  The Wallace book was accessed 11/16/2008 via Google Book search for “’princeton sketches.’”  The college is in Princeton NJ.

 

 

1787.2 – VT Man’s Letter Says “Three Times is Out at Wicket”

 

Levi Allen to Ira Allen, July 7, 1787, in John J. Duffy, ed., Ethan Allen and His Kin, Correspondence, 1772 – 1819 [University Press of New England, Hanover NH, 1998], volume 1, p. 224. Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 75.

 

1787.3 – Marylebone Cricket Club, Later Official Custodian of the Game, is Founded

 

Interview with Stephen Green at Lords.  Note: needs verification.  Also Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 19.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.

 

1787.4 -- US Publisher Offers Books “More Pleasurable Than Bat and Ball”

 

Thomas, Isaiah, publisher, The Royal Primer: or, An Easy and Pleasant Guide to the Art of Reading [Worcester], per David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 179.  The last page of this reader encourages the reader to come to Thomas’ book store, where “they may be suited with Something ore valuable than Cakes, prettier than Tops, handsomer than Kites, more pleasurable that Bat and Ball, more entertaining than either Scating or Sliding, and durable as marbles.”

 

1787.5 – NY Newspaper Prints “Laws of the Noble Game of Cricket”

 

“At the request of several of our Correspondents, we insert the following Laws of the noble Game of Cricket, which govern all the celebrated Players in Europe.”

 

Independent Journal [New York], May 19, 1787.  Accessed via subscription genealogybank.com search, 4/9/09.   Note: the rules do not use the term “innings,” and instead employ “hands.”

 

1788.1 -- Cricketer Experiments with Round-Arm Bowling

 

Says John Ford:  “Tom Walker is said to have experimented with round-arm bowling.”  John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 19.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.  Caveat: The Encyclopedia Brittanica on Nyren’s estimate of about 1790 for Walker’s innovation; A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information, Eleventh Edition,  (Encyclopeida Brittanica Company, New York, 1910) Volume VII, page 439, accessed 10/19/2008, as advised by John Thorn, email of 2/2/2008..

 

1788.2 – Noah Webster, CT Ballplayer?

 

Connecticut lexicographer and writer Noah Webster may have been referring to a baseball- type game when he wrote his journal entry for March 24-25, 1788: ‘Take a long walk.  Play at Nines at Mr Brandons.  Very much indisposed.’”

 

Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It; see page 241.  Altherr cites the diary as Webster, Noah, “Diary,” reprinted in Notes on the Life of Noah Webster, E. E. F Ford, ed., (privately printed, New York, 1912), page 227 of volume 1.  Note: “Nines seems an unusual name for a ball game; do we find it elsewhere?  Could he have been denoting nine-pins or nine-holes?  John Thorn, in 2/3/2008, says he inclines to nine-pins as the game alluded to.

 

1789.1 -- A Tale of Two Cricket Traditions?

 

Ford reports that “A cricket tour to France arranged, but cancelled at the last minute because of the French Revolution.  Per John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 19.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.

 

1789.2 – New York Children’s Pastimes Recalled:  Old Cat, Rounders Cited

 

“ . . . outside school hours, the boys and girls of 1789 probably had as good a time as childhood ever enjoyed.  Swimming and fishing were close to every doorstep  The streets, vacant lots, and nearby fields resounded with the immemorial games of old cat, rounders, hopscotch, I spy, chuck farthing and prisoner’s base . . . .  The Dutch influence made especially popular tick-tack, coasting, and outdoor bowling.”

 

Monaghan, Frank, and Marvin Lowenthal, This Was New York:  The Nation’s Capital in 1789 (Books for Libraries Press, 1970 – originally published 1943 , Chapter 8, “The Woman’s World,” pages 100-101.  Portions of this book are revealed on Google Books, as accessed 12/29/2007.  According to the book’s index, “games” were also covered on pages 80, 81, 115, 177, and 205, all of which were masked.  The volume includes “hundreds of footnotes in the original draft,” according to accompanying information.  Caveat:  We find no reference to the term “rounders” until 1828.  See #1828.1 below.

 

1789.3 – Stoolball Played at Brighthelmstone in Sussex

 

“From the ‘Jernal’ of John Burgess of Ditchling (Sussex) he wrote on Augest 17th 1789 that he went to Brighthelmstone ‘to see many divertions which included Stoolball’.”

 

The XVth (1938) Annual Report of the Stoolball Association for Great Britain [unpublished].  Provided by Kay and John Price, Fall 2009.

 

A web search doesn’t lead to this journal entry, but does locate a similar one:

 

“[August 19, 1788] Went to Brighthelmstone to see many Divertions on account of the Rial Family that is the Duke of Yorks Berth day Cricketing Stool Ball Foot Ball Dancing &c. fire works &c.”  A side note was that some estimated that 20,000 persons attended.

 

Sussex Archaeological Society, Archaeololgical Collections, Volume XL. (1896), “Some Extracts from the Journal and Correspondence of Mr. John Burgess, of Ditchling, Sussex, 1785-1815,” page 156.  Accessed 1/31/10 via Google Books search (“john burgess” ditchling).

 

1790s.1 – Doctor in DE Recalls His “Youthfull Folley”: Included Ball-playing

 

Hancock, Harold B., ed., “William Morgan’s Autobiography and Diary: Life in Sussex County, 1780 – 1857,” Delaware History, volume 19, number 1 [Spring/Summer 1980], pp. 43 - 44.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 80.

 

1790s.2 – Boston Merchant Recalls “Playing Ball on the Common Before Breakfast”

 

Mason, Jonathan, “Recollections of a Septuagenarian,” Downs Special Collection, Winterthur Library [Winterthur, Delaware], Document 30, volume 1, pp. 20 – 21.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball,” reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 81.

 

1790s.3 – Britannica: Stickball Dates to Late 18th Century?

 

“Stickball is a game played on a street or other restricted area, with a stick, such as a mop handle or broomstick, and a hard rubber ball. Stickball developed in the late 18th century from such English games as old cat, rounders, and town ball.  Stickball also relates to a game played in southern England and colonial Boston in North America called stoolball.  All of these games were played on a field with bases, a ball, and one or more sticks.  The modern game is played especially in New York City on the streets where such fixtures as a fire hydrant or an abandoned car serve as bases.”

 

Britannica Online search conducted 5/25/2005.   Note